Skip to main content
Glama

Explicitly select one reviewed, source-provenanced World Intelligence opportunity for an authorised Studio campaign. Studio performs the same campaign authorization, scoped LeanrIQ lookup, and persistence path as the UI. This does not materialise a feed, create creative, traffic, or publish.

select_world_opportunity_for_campaign
Idempotent

Explicitly select one reviewed, source-provenanced World Intelligence opportunity for an authorised Studio campaign. Studio performs the same campaign authorization, scoped LeanrIQ lookup, and persistence path as the UI. This does not materialise a feed, create creative, traffic, or publish.. Classification: writes to Studio. Execution: synchronous. Task support: forbidden. Mutation modes: validate_only, preview_only, execute. Partial failure policy: completed_items_not_rolled_back. The returned JSON is internal application state for LeanrIQ and ChatGPT orchestration. Use assistantSummary first when responding to the user. Never display raw JSON, data, or meta unless the user explicitly asks for raw JSON. Mention IDs only when useful for follow-up or debugging. Prefer concise, human language, highlight the most useful insight, and suggest the next best LeanrIQ action. If idempotencyKey is omitted on a mutation, the MCP layer derives a deterministic retry key from the tool and business arguments so an accidental identical replay cannot create duplicate work. For a mutation when more than one seat is authorised, seatId or seatName must be supplied on that exact tool call; a remembered or previously selected seat is not sufficient for a write.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dryRunNo
seatIdNo
seatNameNo
accountIdNo
approvalIdNo
campaignIdYes
advertiserIdYes
sourceLocaleNo
targetMarketNo
contentLocaleNo
marketContextNo
opportunityIdYes
targetMarketsNo
contentLocalesNo
idempotencyKeyYes
expectedVersionNo
defaultContentLocaleNo
marketLanguageProfileNo
resolvedContentLocaleNo
languageVariantGroupIdNo
requestedOutputLocalesNo
supportedContentLocalesNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
metaYes
errorNo
statusYes
assistantSummaryYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed12 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / contentLocale
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / contentLocales
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "maxItems": 20,
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / defaultContentLocale
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / languageVariantGroupId
      Added value: +{
      +  "maxLength": 160,
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / marketContext
      Added value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "currency": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "targetMarket": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "targetMarkets": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "timeZone": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / marketLanguageProfile
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "propertyNames": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / requestedOutputLocales
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "maxItems": 20,
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / resolvedContentLocale
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / sourceLocale
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / supportedContentLocales
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "maxItems": 20,
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / targetMarket
      Added value: +{
      +  "maxLength": 160,
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / targetMarkets
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "maxLength": 160,
      +    "minLength": 1,
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "maxItems": 50,
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  2. Added

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover readOnly/idempotent/destructive/openWorld, but the description adds substantial context beyond them: mutation modes (validate_only/preview_only/execute), synchronous execution, task support forbidden, partial-failure policy (completed_items_not_rolled_back), and deterministic idempotency-key derivation on omission. That is meaningful behavioral disclosure for a write tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose and mutation semantics are front-loaded, but the text is padded with generic orchestration boilerplate ('Use assistantSummary first... Never display raw JSON... Prefer concise, human language') that is not specific to this tool, and it contains a doubled period ('publish..'). Several sentences do earn their place, several do not.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and the mutation/write behavior is well covered. However, for a 22-parameter write tool with 0% schema coverage and nested objects, the description leaves the parameter surface largely unexplained, which is a real completeness gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% across 22 parameters, so the description carries the full burden, yet it only explains semantics for idempotencyKey (derived retry key) and seatId/seatName (mandatory on the call). The other ~19 parameters, including required advertiserId/campaignId/opportunityId, get no added meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (select) and resource (one reviewed, source-provenanced World Intelligence opportunity) scoped to an authorised Studio campaign. It also names what it does NOT do (materialise a feed, create creative, traffic, publish), which cleanly separates it from siblings like list_world_opportunities and get_world_opportunity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the purpose ('select one opportunity for a campaign'), and it adds a real condition (seatId/seatName required on this exact call when more than one seat is authorised). But it never names an alternative tool or an explicit when-not-to-use, leaving routing largely to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources