Skip to main content
Glama

refresh brand visuals

refresh_brand_visuals
Idempotent

refresh brand visuals. Classification: writes to Studio, creates billable AI usage. Execution: durable. Task support: optional. Mutation modes: validate_only, preview_only, execute. Partial failure policy: completed_items_not_rolled_back. The returned JSON is internal application state for LeanrIQ and ChatGPT orchestration. Use assistantSummary first when responding to the user. Never display raw JSON, data, or meta unless the user explicitly asks for raw JSON. Mention IDs only when useful for follow-up or debugging. Prefer concise, human language, highlight the most useful insight, and suggest the next best LeanrIQ action. If idempotencyKey is omitted on a mutation, the MCP layer derives a deterministic retry key from the tool and business arguments so an accidental identical replay cannot create duplicate work. For a mutation when more than one seat is authorised, seatId or seatName must be supplied on that exact tool call; a remembered or previously selected seat is not sufficient for a write.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
seatIdNo
optionsNo
storageNo
seatNameNo
accountIdYes
brandNameYes
websiteUrlYes
advertiserIdYes
sourceLocaleNo
targetMarketNo
contentLocaleNo
marketContextNo
targetMarketsNo
contentLocalesNo
idempotencyKeyYes
defaultContentLocaleNo
marketLanguageProfileNo
resolvedContentLocaleNo
languageVariantGroupIdNo
requestedOutputLocalesNo
supportedContentLocalesNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
metaYes
errorNo
statusYes
assistantSummaryYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed12 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / contentLocale
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / contentLocales
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "maxItems": 20,
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / defaultContentLocale
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / languageVariantGroupId
      Added value: +{
      +  "maxLength": 160,
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / marketContext
      Added value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "currency": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "targetMarket": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "targetMarkets": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "timeZone": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / marketLanguageProfile
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "propertyNames": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / requestedOutputLocales
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "maxItems": 20,
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / resolvedContentLocale
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / sourceLocale
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / supportedContentLocales
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "maxItems": 20,
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / targetMarket
      Added value: +{
      +  "maxLength": 160,
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / targetMarkets
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "maxLength": 160,
      +    "minLength": 1,
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "maxItems": 50,
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / options / properties / maxImages / default
      Previous value: -30New value: +60
    • changedInput schema / properties / options / properties / maxSocialImages / default
      Previous value: -10New value: +30
  3. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / options / properties / fetchVideos
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": true,
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / options / properties / maxSocialImages
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": 10,
      +  "maximum": 40,
      +  "minimum": 0,
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / options / properties / maxVideos
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": 12,
      +  "maximum": 30,
      +  "minimum": 0,
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
  4. First observed

TDQS

C2.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the annotations by disclosing billable AI usage, durable execution, optional task support, a partial-failure policy of completed_items_not_rolled_back, idempotency-key derivation for omitted keys, and the hard requirement that seatId/seatName be supplied on the exact write call when multiple seats are authorized. None of that appears in the annotations, so it is genuine added value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Operational metadata is front-loaded well, but the middle section is generic orchestration boilerplate about assistantSummary, raw JSON display, and ID mentions that reads like a shared template rather than tool-specific guidance. It is longer than the tool-specific content warrants.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value explanation is rightly omitted, and the description covers mutation modes, billing, partial-failure behavior, idempotency, and seat rules. However, for a 21-parameter mutation tool it leaves the substantive business inputs entirely unexplained, which is a meaningful completeness gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 21 parameters at 0% schema description coverage, the description only clarifies idempotencyKey (derivation behavior) and seatId/seatName (write requirement). The remaining ~18 parameters, including the large nested options and storage objects and all locale/market fields, are undocumented in both schema and description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'refresh brand visuals', which merely restates the tool name and title rather than stating a distinct verb+resource with a clear outcome. 'Writes to Studio' hints at the effect but the core purpose is a tautology, and nothing distinguishes it from siblings like refresh_brand_profile or get_brand_visuals.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The mutation modes (validate_only, preview_only, execute) imply a staged invocation flow, and the seat requirement gives a precondition for writes. However, it never states when to prefer this over refresh_brand_profile or how it relates to get_brand_visuals, so usage is only implied rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources