Get detailed business climate information for a country including costs, talent, tax rates, and ease of doing business.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| country | No | Country name or slug, e.g. 'Poland', 'ukraine', 'georgia' |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It indicates a 'Get' operation but does not state read-only safety, response format, potential errors, or other behaviors. The list of content areas is helpful but does not describe the tool's behavior beyond its purpose.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that efficiently lists key data categories without unnecessary detail. It is concise and well-structured for a simple one-parameter tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While the tool lacks an output schema, the description lists the types of information returned (costs, talent, tax rates, ease of doing business), giving the agent a reasonable understanding of what to expect. The tool is simple, and the description is adequate for selection and invocation, though it could mention the response format or clarify parameter requiredness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% because the 'country' parameter includes examples. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate. It does not clarify whether the parameter is required or optional, but the schema already provides adequate guidance.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves 'detailed business climate information' including costs, talent, tax rates, and ease of doing business. This distinguishes it from siblings like estimate_expansion_costs or get_competitors, though it does not explicitly name those alternatives.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as estimate_expansion_costs or search_services. It implies usage when country-level business climate data is needed but lacks explicit context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: estimating expansion costs, finding competitors, retrieving country info, requesting a call, and searching services. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase underscores (estimate_, get_, request_, search_). This makes the API predictable and easy to navigate.
With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of supporting business expansion research and lead generation. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or bloat.
The tool set covers the full lifecycle of a potential client's journey: discovering services, understanding a country, estimating costs, identifying competitors, and requesting a strategy call. There are no obvious dead ends or missing core operations.
