Skip to main content
Glama

Vila Buarque

by io.github.junoventures

list_movies

List movies available in this neighborhood (only on sites with movies_enabled). Returns now-showing films (with actual showtimes at local cinemas), coming-soon films, and streaming availability. Includes title, genres, TMDB rating, runtime, and detail URL.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax movies to return (default 20, max 100).
statusNoFilter by status. "now_showing" = films with upcoming showtimes at local cinemas. "coming_soon" = unreleased or not yet playing locally. "streaming" = available on streaming services in Brazil. "all" = full catalog (default).

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the conditional availability (movies_enabled), the return categories, and the specific fields included, giving a transparent view of behavior for a read-only list tool. It doesn't cover error handling, but that's a minor gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each adding value: purpose, return categories, and included fields. Front-loaded and free of unnecessary details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description adequately covers return contents (title, genres, TMDB rating, runtime, detail URL). It also explains the status categories. Minor omissions like response structure don't significantly hinder usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with both parameters fully described in the schema. The tool description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what's already in the schema, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists movies available in the neighborhood, with a scoping condition (movies_enabled). It differentiates from siblings by explicitly covering now-showing, coming-soon, and streaming categories, which is distinct from the showtime-specific sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides clear context on when to use (neighborhood, movies_enabled sites) but doesn't explicitly name alternative tools or exclusion criteria. However, the scope and categories are well-defined, so it's clear what this tool is for.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Vila Buarque toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: booking services, restaurant reservations, event tickets, and RSVPs are all clearly separated by domain and described with explicit use cases. Similarly, search_places, search_dishes, and get_restaurant_menus cover different granularities of place/menu lookup. The descriptions include guidance on when to use each tool, eliminating ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., list_*, get_*, create_*, search_*). While a few verbs like 'request' and 'rsvp' differ, they accurately reflect the action's semantics and do not break the overall consistency. The naming makes the tool's purpose predictable from its name.

Tool Count4/5

At 28 tools, this is a large set, but it serves a broad multi-domain directory (places, events, movies, store, bookings, content, etc.). Each tool covers a distinct feature or resource, and there are no redundant tools. The count is at the upper boundary but appropriate for the server's comprehensive scope.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full lifecycle for the directory's main domains: search/discover places, view details, menus, reviews, book services, reserve/RSVP events, browse movies/showtimes, list products, access content (blog, guides, FAQs), submit forms, and check loyalty. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose. The inclusion of pairing tools like list_forms→submit_form and get_availability→create_booking shows deliberate workflow completeness.

Resources