Pinheiros

rsvp_event

RSVP to a free event on this site (Wix Events). NOBODY IS ON THE GUEST LIST YET: a confirmation email goes to the address you provide, and the RSVP is only submitted when that person clicks the link (expires in 24 hours). Tell the user to check their inbox. Use a real address belonging to the person you are acting for — the confirmation link is deliberately not returned to you.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`email`	Yes	The guest's own email — the confirmation link is sent here.
`lastName`	Yes	Guest last name.
`firstName`	Yes	Guest first name.
`event_slug`	Yes	Event slug from list_events.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully discloses key behaviors: the RSVP is not immediate, a confirmation email is sent with a 24-hour expiry link, and the link is deliberately not returned to the agent. This is thorough for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words. The purpose is front-loaded, and critical flow details are compactly presented. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 4 required parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description explains the core workflow and caveats. It lacks return value information, but the focus on the confirmation process is sufficient for the tool's purpose.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds context for 'email' (the guest's own email for confirmation) and 'event_slug' (from list_events). These details enhance understanding beyond the parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool RSVPs to a free event on Wix Events and describes the unique email confirmation process. It distinguishes itself from siblings like 'reserve_event_tickets' by specifying the free event nature and the confirmation flow.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear guidance on using a real email address and notifying the user to check their inbox. Implicitly sets usage context (free events via email confirmation), but does not explicitly exclude other scenarios or name alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Pinheiros tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation: bookings, restaurants, events, forms, etc. Even similar actions like create_booking and request_reservation are clearly differentiated by domain and description.

Naming Consistency5/5

Tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_booking, get_availability, list_blog_posts). Collection retrieval uses list_ while single item uses get_, which is a standard and clear convention.

Tool Count4/5

28 tools is on the upper end, but each serves a distinct function for a comprehensive neighborhood directory (places, events, booking, forms, etc.). No obvious bloat given the scope.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers all major user intents for a local directory: searching places, getting menus, booking services, viewing events, submitting forms, etc. No critical gaps are apparent.

Resources

Need Help?