Skip to main content
Glama

list_pricing_plans

List membership or subscription plans (Wix Pricing Plans). Pass place_slug (from search_places) to list the plans of a specific VENUE — a gym, studio or clinic listed in this directory (e.g. its monthly/annual membership); that is what you want in almost every case. Omitting place_slug lists the directory site's own plans instead, which most sites do not have. Returns plan name, description, price, billing cycle, perks, and a direct checkout URL.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
place_slugNoVenue place slug from search_places. Strongly recommended — without it you get the directory's own plans, not a venue's.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but the description lists return fields (name, description, price, etc.) and implies a read operation with no side effects. Could explicitly state idempotence, but sufficient for a list tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: first introduces tool and key parameter, second explains usage and return contents. No redundancy, front-loaded, every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Completeness is good given single optional parameter and no output schema. Explains both modes, what is returned, and dependency. Minor gap: no mention of pagination or sorting, but likely unnecessary for pricing lists.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema already describes place_slug; description adds context: strongly recommended, explains behavior difference, and links to search_places. Adds value beyond schema, but schema coverage is 100% so baseline 3, elevated due to extra guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists membership/subscription plans, distinguishes between venue-specific and site-wide plans using place_slug, and the verb-resource combination is precise. It differentiates from sibling list tools by specifying 'pricing plans' and the venue context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises to use place_slug from search_places for venue plans ('what you want in almost every case'), and warns that omitting it gives directory plans. Provides clear when-to-use and dependency guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation: bookings, restaurants, events, forms, etc. Even similar actions like create_booking and request_reservation are clearly differentiated by domain and description.

Naming Consistency5/5

Tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_booking, get_availability, list_blog_posts). Collection retrieval uses list_ while single item uses get_, which is a standard and clear convention.

Tool Count4/5

28 tools is on the upper end, but each serves a distinct function for a comprehensive neighborhood directory (places, events, booking, forms, etc.). No obvious bloat given the scope.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers all major user intents for a local directory: searching places, getting menus, booking services, viewing events, submitting forms, etc. No critical gaps are apparent.

Resources