Create a direct checkout URL for one or more store products (Wix Stores). The user clicks the URL to complete payment on the site — no login required on the AI agent side.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| items | Yes | Products to add to cart. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It states the tool creates a URL and the user completes payment, but does not explain side effects (e.g., whether a checkout session is created), required permissions, error handling, or idempotency. For a creation tool, more transparency is needed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences efficiently convey the main action and key context (user flow, no login). Every sentence adds value; no redundancy or fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Description covers the tool's result (a URL) and user flow, but lacks return format details (e.g., whether URL is returned directly or wrapped in an object) and does not mention error cases or prerequisites like needing product IDs from list_products. For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, it is moderately complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds context (Wix Stores, 'one or more products') but does not enhance parameter meaning beyond the schema's 'Products to add to cart.' No additional semantic value for the items parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it creates a direct checkout URL for store products, specifies the platform (Wix Stores), and distinguishes from sibling tools like create_booking (different resource) and list_products (read vs. action). The verb 'create' and resource 'checkout URL' are specific and unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Description implies usage when needing a checkout URL for products, and usefully notes that no login is required on the AI agent side. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when not to use this tool (e.g., if booking a service, use create_booking) and does not mention alternatives or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a distinct domain action, with clear boundaries between similar operations (e.g., create_booking vs request_reservation vs reserve_event_tickets). Descriptions provide enough context to avoid confusion.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, e.g., create_booking, get_availability, list_events. No mixing of styles or ambiguous verbs.
28 tools is slightly above average but appropriate for a multi-feature neighborhood directory covering bookings, events, movies, menus, forms, etc. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, justifying the count.
The tool set covers most expected operations for a directory site: search, details, reviews, booking, events, menus, blog, FAQ, forms, etc. Minor gaps like cancellation or user booking history are acceptable given the domain scope.