Moema

search_dishes

Find which restaurants serve a dish in this neighborhood. Searches every menu item across all restaurants on the site, grouped by dish — e.g. query "feijoada" returns each restaurant serving it with price, description, dietary labels, and the place URL. Omit the query to list the most-served dishes. Use this for any "where can I eat X" question.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`limit`	No	Max dishes to return (default 20, max 50).
`query`	No	Dish name or part of it, e.g. "feijoada", "pizza margherita". Omit to list top dishes.

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Discloses search scope (all restaurants on site), grouping, and returned fields (price, description, dietary labels, URL). Lacks details on auth or rate limits, but these are less critical for a search tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no wasted words. Efficient and clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Complete for a simple search tool with two optional parameters. No output schema needed as description explains return format. All necessary info is present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions. Description adds value beyond schema by explaining that omitting query lists top dishes, and re-iterates limit behavior. Provides context for typical usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the verb 'find' and resource 'restaurants serving a dish in this neighborhood'. Distinguishes from siblings like search_places by specifying neighborhood scope and grouping by dish.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use: for 'where can I eat X' questions. Also explains behavior when query is omitted. Lacks explicit when-not-to-use, but context is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Moema tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource and action (e.g., create_booking, create_checkout, request_reservation, reserve_event_tickets, rsvp_event all differ in purpose). Even similar-sounding tools like search_places and list_categories serve complementary roles (search vs taxonomy). No ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All 28 tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_booking, get_availability, list_blog_posts). No mixing of conventions or vague verbs.

Tool Count4/5

28 tools is above the typical 3-15 range but appropriate for the comprehensive scope of a neighborhood directory covering multiple Wix integrations (bookings, events, store, restaurants, etc.). Slightly heavy but well-scoped.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of a neighborhood directory: search, details, reviews, menus, booking, events, movies, offers, forms, FAQs, loyalty, etc. No obvious gaps; each domain has create/read/update/delete where applicable.

Resources

Need Help?