Interlagos

list_events

List upcoming events in this neighborhood with date, venue, price, and URL. Events within the next 7 days include a weatherForecast (condition + min/max temperature) for the event day — use it to tell users e.g. "the event is at X and it will be raining". Pass filter to narrow by time or price; filter: "agora" answers "what can I go to right now" and is resolved live on every call, which no cached page can do.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`limit`	No	Max events to return (default 20, max 50).
`filter`	No	Narrow the list: "agora" = on stage at this exact moment (season runs and day-granular sources are excluded, because their stored window says nothing about whether a session is on right now); "hoje"/"amanha"/"fim-de-semana" = running on those days, including multi-day runs; "gratis" = free to attend, including externally-ticketed events priced at 0.
`upcoming_only`	No	Only return upcoming or in-progress events (default true).

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses behavioral traits beyond the input schema: events within 7 days include a weatherForecast, and the 'agora' filter is resolved live each call. No destructive behavior is indicated, which is appropriate for a read-only listing tool. Without annotations, description carries full burden and does so well.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with the primary purpose stated first, followed by additional details about weather and filter. Every sentence adds value; no waste. The structure is logical and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description specifies returned fields (date, venue, price, URL) and the weather condition for upcoming events. It explains the filter parameter in detail. It does not mention pagination or default ordering, but for a simple list tool, it is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds significant value for the 'filter' parameter by explaining each enum option, especially 'agora' with its caching behavior. The other parameters (limit, upcoming_only) are adequately covered by the schema, so overall exceeds baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists upcoming events with specific fields (date, venue, price, URL). The verb 'list' and resource 'events' are explicit. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like get_event_tickets or reserve_event_tickets, though the scope 'in this neighborhood' provides some distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear guidance on using the 'filter' parameter to narrow results, especially explaining the 'agora' filter's live resolution advantage over cached pages. However, it does not specify when to use alternatives (e.g., get_event_tickets) or when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Interlagos tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Every tool targets a distinct Wix resource or action: bookings, events, store, forms, places, menus, etc. The four booking-related tools are clearly separated by domain (appointments, restaurant tables, paid events, free events), with descriptions that eliminate ambiguity.

Naming Consistency4/5

The set follows a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (create_, get_, list_, search_, submit_). Minor deviations exist: get_reviews and get_event_tickets return collections (could be list_), and rsvp_event uses an abbreviation, but these do not affect clarity.

Tool Count4/5

At 26 tools, the set is larger than the typical 3–15 well-scoped range, but the server covers a broad umbrella of Wix integrations for a neighborhood directory. Each tool maps to a distinct function, so the count is justified by the scope, though it is on the heavier side.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers discovery and transactional workflows: searching places/dishes, viewing menus/reviews/guides/offers, booking appointments and tables, reserving event tickets, purchasing products, submitting forms, and reading site info. Minor gaps exist (no cancel/update operations), but these are handled via external checkout links and are acceptable for a directory.

Resources

Need Help?