Interlagos

create_booking

Book an appointment slot at a venue (Wix Bookings). NOTHING IS BOOKED UNTIL THE CUSTOMER PAYS: this returns a checkout URL, and the booking stays off the venue's calendar until a human opens that URL and completes payment on the venue's own site. Tell the user they must open the link. Call get_availability immediately before this — the slot is re-validated server-side and a taken slot is rejected. The contact email is NOT verified at this step; the checkout is what confirms it.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`contact`	Yes	Who the booking is for. All three are required by the venue to confirm or reschedule.
`endDate`	Yes	Slot end as an ISO instant, exactly as returned by get_availability.
`serviceId`	Yes	Service ID from list_booking_services (called with the same place_slug).
`startDate`	Yes	Slot start as an ISO instant, exactly as returned by get_availability.
`place_slug`	Yes	Venue place slug from search_places.
`resourceId`	No	Optional staff/resource ID from the slot, when the user picked a specific professional.

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It fully discloses the asynchronous payment requirement, that the slot is re-validated server-side, and that contact email is not verified until checkout. Excellent transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is front-loaded with the main action and key caveats. While slightly long, every sentence adds necessary detail for correct tool usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complex async flow and absence of output schema, the description fully explains the expected outcome (checkout URL) and required user action. No gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with all parameters documented. The description adds value beyond schema (e.g., startDate/endDate must match get_availability output, contact fields required by venue). Nested objects are explained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool books an appointment slot at a venue (Wix Bookings) and clarifies that nothing is booked until payment is completed via a checkout URL. This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like get_availability or create_checkout.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to call get_availability immediately before and explains the payment flow (checkout URL, user must open link). Does not explicitly state when not to use, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Interlagos tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Every tool targets a distinct Wix resource or action: bookings, events, store, forms, places, menus, etc. The four booking-related tools are clearly separated by domain (appointments, restaurant tables, paid events, free events), with descriptions that eliminate ambiguity.

Naming Consistency4/5

The set follows a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (create_, get_, list_, search_, submit_). Minor deviations exist: get_reviews and get_event_tickets return collections (could be list_), and rsvp_event uses an abbreviation, but these do not affect clarity.

Tool Count4/5

At 26 tools, the set is larger than the typical 3–15 well-scoped range, but the server covers a broad umbrella of Wix integrations for a neighborhood directory. Each tool maps to a distinct function, so the count is justified by the scope, though it is on the heavier side.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers discovery and transactional workflows: searching places/dishes, viewing menus/reviews/guides/offers, booking appointments and tables, reserving event tickets, purchasing products, submitting forms, and reading site info. Minor gaps exist (no cancel/update operations), but these are handled via external checkout links and are acceptable for a directory.

Resources

Need Help?