Gracie Barra Jiu-Jitsu

get_availability

Get available time slots for a bookable service on a given date (Wix Bookings). Pass the serviceId from list_booking_services and a date in YYYY-MM-DD. Pass the same place_slug you used there — slot times are returned in the VENUE's timezone, which is not necessarily the directory's.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`date`	Yes	Date in YYYY-MM-DD format (e.g. "2026-06-25").
`serviceId`	Yes	Service ID from list_booking_services.
`place_slug`	No	Venue place slug — use the same one passed to list_booking_services.

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Discloses timezone behavior (slots returned in venue's timezone). Could mention pagination or result structure, but current disclosure is good for a read tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no redundancy. Key points about source, date format, and timezone are front-loaded. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, description does not specify return format, which may leave agent uncertain. However, core functionality and usage are complete. Sibling tools list is large but description sufficiently differentiates.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with good descriptions. Description adds context: source of serviceId, date format reinforcement, place_slug consistency requirement. Adds value beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'Get available time slots', resource 'bookable service', and specific constraints (date, venue). Distinguishes from sibling tools like list_booking_services and create_booking by focusing on availability.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use: pass serviceId from list_booking_services, date in YYYY-MM-DD, same place_slug. Warns about timezone behavior. No exclusion statements but sufficient guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Gracie Barra Jiu-Jitsu tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource and action. Even similar operations like create_booking, request_reservation, reserve_event_tickets, and rsvp_event are clearly differentiated by their descriptions and the entities they handle (bookable services, restaurant tables, paid events, free events). No two tools appear to do the same thing.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase and underscores (e.g., create_booking, get_availability, list_events, search_places). This uniform convention makes the tool set predictable and easy for an agent to understand and select from.

Tool Count3/5

With 28 tools, the set is relatively large, exceeding the typical well-scoped range of 3-15. While each tool serves a specific purpose within the neighborhood directory domain, the count feels heavy and may overwhelm simple use cases. A reduction or grouping could improve coherence.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers a broad range of user-facing operations for a neighborhood directory: searching places, browsing menus, booking services, reserving tables and event tickets, listing products and events, retrieving reviews and FAQs, and submitting forms. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no cancellation or create_review tool), but the core workflows are well-supported.

Resources

Need Help?