Skip to main content
Glama

Bela Vista

by io.github.junoventures

list_booking_services

List a venue's services — what it offers, with price and duration. Pass place_slug (from search_places) to list the services of a specific VENUE — a salon, clinic or studio listed in this directory; that is what you want in almost every case, and it is the only form whose serviceId works with create_booking. Omitting place_slug lists the directory site's own services instead, which most sites do not have. Returns name, description, price, duration in minutes, and bookableViaMcp. Services are listed for EVERY venue, including those with no online booking system — check bookableViaMcp: when it is false, id is null and you cannot book through create_booking, so point the user at bookingUrl or the venue's page instead.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
place_slugNoVenue place slug from search_places. Strongly recommended — without it you get the directory's own services, not a venue's.

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully discloses behavioral traits: it lists all services regardless of bookability, indicates bookableViaMcp flag, notes id is null when not bookable, and explains the effect of omitting place_slug. It also clarifies that services are listed even for venues without online booking.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose and provides necessary details in a logical order. It is slightly long but every sentence adds value; could be marginally more concise, but still well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema, the description thoroughly explains return fields (name, description, price, duration, bookableViaMcp, id) and handles edge cases (bookableViaMcp false, place_slug omitted). It gives the agent everything needed to use the tool correctly in context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although the schema already covers the parameter with a description, the tool description adds significant nuance: the effect of omitting place_slug, the distinction between venue and directory services, and the integration with create_booking. This adds value beyond the schema, but since schema coverage is 100%, a score of 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists a venue's services with price and duration, and distinguishes between using place_slug (venue-specific) and omitting it (directory's own services). It specifies the verb 'list' and the resource 'venue services', making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit guidance: pass place_slug from search_places for venue services, which is the typical use case; omitting it gives directory's services (rarely used). It also explains what to do when bookableViaMcp is false—direct user to bookingUrl or venue page—and notes that serviceId works with create_booking.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Bela Vista toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

All 28 tools have clearly distinct purposes. Overlaps like create_booking vs request_reservation are well-delineated by descriptions: one for appointments with checkout URL, the other for table requests via email confirmation. Similarly, reserve_event_tickets vs rsvp_event, and get_restaurant_menus vs search_dishes are complementary.

Naming Consistency5/5

Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_booking, get_availability, list_events, search_places). Verbs indicate action type (get/list for retrieval, create/reserve for creation), and nouns are specific entities. No mixing of conventions.

Tool Count4/5

28 tools is above the typical 3-15 range but appropriate for the broad scope of a neighborhood directory with multiple Wix integrations (Bookings, Events, Stores, Reviews, etc.). Each tool covers a distinct feature, and no tool feels redundant.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers the main user workflows: searching places, viewing details and menus, checking availability, making bookings/reservations, and managing event tickets. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no update/cancel for bookings, no booking status check), but these are acceptable as the server focuses on initiating actions.

Resources