Agenda SP

rsvp_event

RSVP to a free event on this site (Wix Events). NOBODY IS ON THE GUEST LIST YET: a confirmation email goes to the address you provide, and the RSVP is only submitted when that person clicks the link (expires in 24 hours). Tell the user to check their inbox. Use a real address belonging to the person you are acting for — the confirmation link is deliberately not returned to you.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`email`	Yes	The guest's own email — the confirmation link is sent here.
`lastName`	Yes	Guest last name.
`firstName`	Yes	Guest first name.
`event_slug`	Yes	Event slug from list_events.

TDQS

A4.8/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses key behavioral traits: no instant RSVP, email confirmation required, link expiry, and that the confirmation link is not returned. No annotations provided, so description carries full burden and does it well.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences with front-loaded purpose, no fluff, each sentence adds essential information. Capitalization for emphasis is appropriate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Explains workflow well but does not mention return value or error handling. Without output schema, a hint about response format would improve completeness. Otherwise adequate for a simple RSVP tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema already has 100% coverage with descriptions for each parameter. The description adds contextual value (e.g., email gets confirmation link) but does not fundamentally extend parameter meaning beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool is for RSVPing to a free event on Wix Events. The verb 'RSVP' and resource 'event' are specific, and it distinguishes from siblings like reserve_event_tickets for paid events.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit usage guidance: RSVP is not immediate, confirmation email sent, link expires in 24 hours, instructs to tell user to check inbox, and uses real address. Implies when to use (free events) and not to use (paid events via sibling context).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Agenda SP tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Disambiguation4/5

Tools are mostly distinct with clear descriptions. Some overlap in actions that require user to click a link (create_booking, create_checkout, request_reservation, etc.), but each targets a different domain (booking, store, restaurant, event tickets, RSVP). Minor ambiguity possible but descriptions clarify.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., create_booking, get_availability, search_places). No deviations or mixed conventions.

Tool Count4/5

28 tools is slightly high for a neighborhood directory, but each serves a specific function (search, booking, events, movies, offers, etc.). The scope justifies the count, though some tools like list_blog_posts and list_faqs might be considered niche.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers search, place details, categories, menus, events, movies, offers, booking, and forms. Missing update/delete operations for places or user management, but these are likely out of scope for a read-only directory. Core queries and actions are well-supported.

Resources

Need Help?