Skip to main content
Glama

Agenda Rio

by io.github.junoventures

list_events

List upcoming events in this neighborhood with date, venue, price, and URL. Events within the next 7 days include a weatherForecast (condition + min/max temperature) for the event day — use it to tell users e.g. "the event is at X and it will be raining". Pass filter to narrow by time or price; filter: "agora" answers "what can I go to right now" and is resolved live on every call, which no cached page can do.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax events to return (default 20, max 50).
filterNoNarrow the list: "agora" = on stage at this exact moment (season runs and day-granular sources are excluded, because their stored window says nothing about whether a session is on right now); "hoje"/"amanha"/"fim-de-semana" = running on those days, including multi-day runs; "gratis" = free to attend, including externally-ticketed events priced at 0.
upcoming_onlyNoOnly return upcoming or in-progress events (default true).

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Despite no annotations, the description discloses that the tool returns weather forecasts for events within 7 days and that the 'agora' filter is resolved live. It implies read-only behavior but does not explicitly state absence of side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, front-loads the main purpose, and every sentence adds value (listing fields, weather note, filter guidance). No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequately covers the tool's purpose and key features but does not mention output ordering, pagination beyond limit, or how to handle multi-day events. Given no output schema, a bit more detail on return format could help.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the description adds significant value for the filter parameter by detailing the meaning of 'agora' and other values. For limit and upcoming_only, it adds minimal additional context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states it lists upcoming events with specific fields (date, venue, price, URL) and distinguishes itself from sibling tools by focusing on events listing rather than actions like booking or reserving.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear guidance on using the filter parameter to narrow by time or price, with a specific example for 'agora' that explains live resolution. However, it does not mention when to use alternatives like get_event_tickets or reserve_event_tickets.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Agenda Rio toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with detailed descriptions that prevent ambiguity. Overlaps like create_booking vs request_reservation are clarified by domain (appointments vs restaurant) and mechanics.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_booking, list_events, search_places). The same conjugation style (snake_case) is used throughout, with no mixing of conventions.

Tool Count4/5

At 28 tools, the set is slightly larger than the typical well-scoped range (3-15), but each tool corresponds to a distinct feature of the neighborhood directory, making the count reasonable for the breadth of functionality.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers all major user-facing actions: searching, browsing, booking, purchasing, and retrieving information. No obvious gaps exist for the stated purpose of a neighborhood directory.

Resources