Skip to main content
Glama

get_event_tickets

Get ticket types and prices for a specific event (Wix Events). Pass the event slug from list_events. Returns ticket names, prices, sale status, and how many are left.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
event_slugYesEvent slug from list_events.

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Openly describes the output (names, prices, sale status, availability) and implies a read-only operation without destructive side effects. No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden; it is sufficient but could explicitly state that no data is modified.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: the first states the purpose and context, the second gives parameter source and output summary. No wasted words, front-loaded with key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Fully explains what the tool does, how to use it (parameter from list_events), and what it returns (names, prices, sale status, availability). For a simple, one-parameter read tool with no output schema, this is complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter, event_slug, is described in the schema as 'Event slug from list_events.' The description adds value by repeating this and emphasizing the dependency on list_events, which aids understanding beyond the schema alone. With 100% schema coverage, baseline is 3, but the extra context justifies a 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get ticket types and prices'), the specific resource ('specific event', 'Wix Events'), and distinguishes from sibling tools like reserve_event_tickets and rsvp_event by focusing on retrieval rather than modification or attendance confirmation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance to use the event slug from list_events, linking to a sibling tool and clarifying the prerequisite. Could be improved by mentioning when to use this tool versus alternatives like reserve_event_tickets, but for a simple read operation it is adequate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with detailed descriptions that prevent ambiguity. Overlaps like create_booking vs request_reservation are clarified by domain (appointments vs restaurant) and mechanics.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_booking, list_events, search_places). The same conjugation style (snake_case) is used throughout, with no mixing of conventions.

Tool Count4/5

At 28 tools, the set is slightly larger than the typical well-scoped range (3-15), but each tool corresponds to a distinct feature of the neighborhood directory, making the count reasonable for the breadth of functionality.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers all major user-facing actions: searching, browsing, booking, purchasing, and retrieving information. No obvious gaps exist for the stated purpose of a neighborhood directory.

Resources