Aclimação

rsvp_event

RSVP to a free event on this site (Wix Events). NOBODY IS ON THE GUEST LIST YET: a confirmation email goes to the address you provide, and the RSVP is only submitted when that person clicks the link (expires in 24 hours). Tell the user to check their inbox. Use a real address belonging to the person you are acting for — the confirmation link is deliberately not returned to you.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`email`	Yes	The guest's own email — the confirmation link is sent here.
`lastName`	Yes	Guest last name.
`firstName`	Yes	Guest first name.
`event_slug`	Yes	Event slug from list_events.

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully discloses behavior: no immediate guest list entry, email-based confirmation, 24-hour link expiry, and the need to inform the user. There are no contradictions or omissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences with no fluff. Key information is front-loaded, and every sentence adds essential guidance. It is appropriately sized for the tool's simplicity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema or annotations, the description covers the RSVP flow, user expectations, and behavioral constraints. It is complete for a tool with 4 required parameters and straightforward behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add meaning beyond the schema; each parameter's description in the schema is identical to the tool description's mentions. No extra context is provided for parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool is for RSVPing to a free event on Wix Events, using specific verb 'RSVP' and resource 'free event'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like reserve_event_tickets, which handle paid ticketed events.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains the asynchronous flow (confirmation email, link expiry, user must check inbox) and mandates using a real address. It lacks explicit comparison to sibling tools but the context of free vs paid events is implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Aclimação tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct domain (booking, events, places, food, movies, etc.) with clear boundaries. Even similar actions like reservations are clearly differentiated by context (booking appointment vs. table vs. event tickets vs. RSVP).

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_booking, get_availability, list_events, search_places). No mixing of conventions or vague verbs.

Tool Count4/5

28 tools is on the higher end but justifiable for a comprehensive neighborhood directory covering bookings, events, store, reviews, FAQs, guides, offers, movies, and more. Each tool serves a specific purpose without redundancy.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers the main user workflows (searching places, booking services, events, food ordering, loyalty, reviews). Minor gaps like lack of user account management or direct payment handling are acceptable for a directory MCP.

Resources

Need Help?