Skip to main content
Glama

create_booking

Book an appointment slot at a venue (Wix Bookings). NOTHING IS BOOKED UNTIL THE CUSTOMER PAYS: this returns a checkout URL, and the booking stays off the venue's calendar until a human opens that URL and completes payment on the venue's own site. Tell the user they must open the link. Call get_availability immediately before this — the slot is re-validated server-side and a taken slot is rejected. The contact email is NOT verified at this step; the checkout is what confirms it.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contactYesWho the booking is for. All three are required by the venue to confirm or reschedule.
endDateYesSlot end as an ISO instant, exactly as returned by get_availability.
serviceIdYesService ID from list_booking_services (called with the same place_slug).
startDateYesSlot start as an ISO instant, exactly as returned by get_availability.
place_slugYesVenue place slug from search_places.
resourceIdNoOptional staff/resource ID from the slot, when the user picked a specific professional.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description fully discloses that the tool returns a checkout URL, the booking stays off-calendar until payment, and email is not verified at this step. It provides critical behavioral traits beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is somewhat long but every sentence adds value. It is front-loaded with key warnings. Could be slightly more concise without losing information, but it is well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (6 params, nested object, no output schema), the description provides essential behavioral context about the checkout flow, preconditions, and limitations. It equips the agent with all necessary information to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter descriptions. The description adds contextual value (e.g., slot format, contact requirements) but does not significantly enhance meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it books an appointment slot at a venue, and distinguishes itself from siblings like get_availability and create_checkout by emphasizing that nothing is booked until payment. It specifies the verb and resource precisely.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly instructs to call get_availability immediately before this tool, warns about slot re-validation and rejection, and tells the user they must open the checkout link. This is comprehensive guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct domain (booking, events, places, food, movies, etc.) with clear boundaries. Even similar actions like reservations are clearly differentiated by context (booking appointment vs. table vs. event tickets vs. RSVP).

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_booking, get_availability, list_events, search_places). No mixing of conventions or vague verbs.

Tool Count4/5

28 tools is on the higher end but justifiable for a comprehensive neighborhood directory covering bookings, events, store, reviews, FAQs, guides, offers, movies, and more. Each tool serves a specific purpose without redundancy.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers the main user workflows (searching places, booking services, events, food ordering, loyalty, reviews). Minor gaps like lack of user account management or direct payment handling are acceptable for a directory MCP.

Resources