Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents title, summary shape, messages, metadata and overwrite; baseline is 3. The description adds cross-call semantics the schema does not carry — reuse session_id/title across saves, fetch existing messages before appending, and always supply a complete summary plus metadata.tool_source — which is genuinely useful but partial.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.