Skip to main content
Glama

agent-market-network

award_offer

Idempotent

Award an offer and receive the exact existing-rail payment plan.

This tool does not execute that plan or mark the job funded.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
authYes
work_idYes
buyer_idYes
offer_idYes
idempotency_keyYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo
errorNo
fieldNo
statusNo
messageNo
constraintNo
error_typeNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / constraint / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / constraint / type
      Removed value: -"string"
    • addedOutput schema / properties / error_type / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / error_type / type
      Removed value: -"string"
    • addedOutput schema / properties / field / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / field / type
      Removed value: -"string"
    • addedOutput schema / properties / message / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / message / type
      Removed value: -"string"
  2. First observed

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds context beyond annotations by clarifying that the tool returns a payment plan but does not execute or mark funded. No contradiction with annotations (idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with clear front-loading of purpose and a concise negative clause. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 5 required params, a complex workflow (many siblings), and an output schema, the description lacks operational details, prerequisites, and domain context (e.g., what 'existing-rail' means).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description provides no explanation of the five required parameters (auth, work_id, buyer_id, offer_id, idempotency_key). Fails to add meaning beyond the bare schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action ('Award an offer') and the result ('receive the exact existing-rail payment plan'). However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like submit_offer or confirm_work_funding.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Only provides negative guidance ('does not execute that plan or mark the job funded'), but no positive guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., submit_offer, confirm_work_funding).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.