Skip to main content
Glama

Wudao A-Share Stock Data MCP

official_interactions

Read-onlyIdempotent

查询深交所互动易和上证 e 互动问董秘数据。默认读取站内记录;支持 keywords 多关键词一次检索并返回 matchedKeywords;verificationMode=live 较慢,仅用于用户明确要求官网实时核验;verificationMode=auto 会先查站内记录,缺失时再补查官网。 何时使用: 查官方互动问答(深交所互动易/上证 e 互动)。默认使用站内记录;支持 keywords 多关键词并行检索;只有用户明确要求官网实时核验/站内记录缺失补查时才切到实时或自动核验。 【链接】rows/items/嵌套股票对象含 code/name;列股必须用 [name(code)](https://stock.quicktiny.cn/quote/<code>) markdown 链接。

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
codeNo股票代码或名称,例如 601991、大唐发电、601991.SH。与 stock/stockCode/keywordStock 任传其一。
daysNo相对回看天数,默认 30。传 startDate 时优先 startDate。
pageNo页码,默认 1。
limitNo返回数量,默认 20,最大 100。
stockNo股票代码或名称,例如 601991、大唐发电、601991.SH。与 stockCode/code/keywordStock 任传其一。
formatNocontent[0].text:默认1行 headline;markdown=完整 markdown 表格;json=完整 JSON。
statusNo回复状态:all/answered/unanswered。默认 all。all
endDateNo问题结束日期,格式 YYYY-MM-DD;不传默认今天。
keywordNo问答内容关键词。兼容单关键词调用;多关键词优先用 keywords。
exchangeNo交易所筛选:SZSE 或 SSE。通常可不传,由股票代码推断。
keywordsNo多关键词并行检索,数组或逗号/顿号分隔字符串,例如 ["算力","数据中心","火电"]。最多 10 个;返回 rows 会标注 matchedKeywords。
maxPagesNo实时核验或自动补查时最多检查页数,默认 1,最大 20。
startDateNo问题开始日期,格式 YYYY-MM-DD;不传默认近 30 天。
stockCodeNo股票代码或名称,例如 601991、大唐发电、601991.SH。与 stock/code/keywordStock 任传其一。
stockNameNo公司简称关键词。
detailLevelNo档位:默认 standard(Agent 可计算标准字段);summary=压缩摘要;raw=全字段+原始数据。
keywordModeNo多关键词匹配方式:any=命中任一关键词(默认);all=同一条记录需命中全部关键词。any
keywordStockNo股票代码或名称别名。
interactionScopeNo互动问答范围:all=深交所+上交所,szse=互动易,sse=上证 e 互动。all
verificationModeNo核验模式:default=站内记录(默认、最快);live=官网实时核验(较慢,仅用户明确要求时使用);auto=先查站内记录,无结果再实时核验。default

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo
metaNo
successNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / detailLevel / description
      Previous value: -"输出详细度(不传=standard,返回 Agent 可计算标准字段)。summary=压缩摘要;raw=全字段+原始数据。"New value: +"档位:默认 standard(Agent 可计算标准字段);summary=压缩摘要;raw=全字段+原始数据。"
    • changedInput schema / properties / format / description
      Previous value: -"content[0].text 形态。通常不传=1 行 headline;auction_market_scan / auction_theme_strength 在 standard/raw 档默认直接返回 JSON 明细。markdown=完整 markdown 表格;json=完整 JSON。"New value: +"content[0].text:默认1行 headline;markdown=完整 markdown 表格;json=完整 JSON。"
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {},
      +    "meta": {},
      +    "success": {}
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, openWorld), so the bar is lower. The description adds real behavioral value: the latency tradeoff of live verification and the fallback semantics of auto mode, which are not visible in the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with purpose, but the verificationMode tradeoffs and the keywords/matchedKeywords behavior are each stated twice (body plus 何时使用), and the trailing 【链接】 formatting block sits oddly at the end of a query-tool description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return-value explanation is unnecessary, and 100% schema coverage means parameters are well documented. The description covers purpose, default behavior, and verification tradeoffs sufficiently for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents every parameter, and the enum/param semantics are repeated here (keywords, verificationMode, matchedKeywords) rather than extended. Baseline 3 applies since the schema carries the load and the description mostly reinforces it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: querying official investor Q&A (深交所互动易/上证 e 互动问董秘数据). It is clearly distinct from the 公告-oriented siblings like official_announcements and official_disclosure_evidence, though it never names those siblings explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit 何时使用 section and spells out the switching condition for verificationMode (default station records; live only on explicit user request; auto when records are missing). It stops short of naming an alternative tool to use instead, so it is strong context but not full when/not-when/alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.