Skip to main content
Glama

Wudao A-Share Stock Data MCP

minute_data

Read-onlyIdempotent

获取个股实时或指定交易日分时走势,含价格、均价和成交量;历史日期优先读取单股归档 何时使用: 个股分时路径:盘中查实时走势;历史查询传 tradeDate,优先读取“单票+交易日”归档。

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
codeYes必填。股票代码或名称,例如 600519、600519.SH、贵州茅台。返回个股实时或指定交易日分时走势。
ndaysNo分时天数,默认 1;指定 tradeDate 时只返回该交易日。
formatNocontent[0].text:默认1行 headline;markdown=完整 markdown 表格;json=完整 JSON。
tradeDateNo可选。指定历史交易日,支持 YYYY-MM-DD 或 YYYYMMDD;优先读取“单票+交易日”长期归档,不回退成当天实时走势。
embedStockNo是否回完整 stock 档案(行业/地区/交易所等)。不传=false。
detailLevelNo档位:默认 standard(Agent 可计算标准字段);summary=压缩摘要;raw=全字段+原始数据。

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo
metaNo
successNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / detailLevel / description
      Previous value: -"输出详细度(不传=standard,返回 Agent 可计算标准字段)。summary=压缩摘要;raw=全字段+原始数据。"New value: +"档位:默认 standard(Agent 可计算标准字段);summary=压缩摘要;raw=全字段+原始数据。"
    • changedInput schema / properties / format / description
      Previous value: -"content[0].text 形态。通常不传=1 行 headline;auction_market_scan / auction_theme_strength 在 standard/raw 档默认直接返回 JSON 明细。markdown=完整 markdown 表格;json=完整 JSON。"New value: +"content[0].text:默认1行 headline;markdown=完整 markdown 表格;json=完整 JSON。"
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {},
      +    "meta": {},
      +    "success": {}
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds that historical dates preferentially read single-stock archives, but this behavior is already documented in the tradeDate parameter schema; no auth, rate-limit, or freshness details are added.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, front-loads what the tool does, and follows with a when-to-use note. It has a minor redundancy, repeating the historical archive preference twice, but overall it is efficiently structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema exists and parameter descriptions are complete, the description need not explain return values. It covers purpose and when to use adequately, though it leaves a gap in sibling selection by not differentiating from kline or intraday_main_flow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all six parameters are fully documented in the schema. The description only restates the tradeDate usage pattern, which is already in the parameter description, and adds no syntax or format guidance beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 获取个股实时或指定交易日分时走势, and lists returned data (价格、均价、成交量). It is clear what the tool does, but it does not explicitly distinguish itself from sibling tools such as kline or intraday_main_flow.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides an explicit 何时使用 section: use for real-time intraday trend during trading hours, and pass tradeDate for historical queries that read from the single-stock archive. It gives clear context but does not state when not to use the tool or name alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.