Skip to main content
Glama

GridHub Electricity Market Data

All zones right now

get_map_snapshot
Read-onlyIdempotent

Current headline values for all 25 zones in one call — the cheapest way to compare zones (e.g. 'which European zone has the lowest price right now', 'rank US ISOs by demand'). Rebuilt every 5 minutes. Authentication: send 'Authorization: Bearer ' on the MCP connection (free key, 500 requests/day, instant email signup at https://grid-hub.app/developers), or pay per call with x402 (USDC on Base) via the X-PAYMENT header. With no credentials, data tools run in free sample mode: real, current data but truncated (history capped at 50 rows; brief returns one context block). Sample results are clearly marked.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
api_keyNoOptional GridHub API key (ghk_...). Prefer sending it as an 'Authorization: Bearer <key>' HTTP header on the MCP connection; use this argument only if your client cannot set headers. Without a key the tool runs in free sample mode (truncated output).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
zonesNo
generatedNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "generated": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "number",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "zones": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "attribution": {
      +            "type": [
      +              "string",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "license": {
      +            "type": [
      +              "string",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "metrics": {
      +            "additionalProperties": {
      +              "properties": {
      +                "resolution": {
      +                  "type": [
      +                    "string",
      +                    "null"
      +                  ]
      +                },
      +                "ts": {
      +                  "type": [
      +                    "number",
      +                    "null"
      +                  ]
      +                },
      +                "unit": {
      +                  "type": [
      +                    "string",
      +                    "null"
      +                  ]
      +                },
      +                "value": {
      +                  "type": [
      +                    "number",
      +                    "null"
      +                  ]
      +                }
      +              },
      +              "type": [
      +                "object",
      +                "null"
      +              ]
      +            },
      +            "type": [
      +              "object",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "updated": {
      +            "type": [
      +              "number",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "zone": {
      +            "type": [
      +              "string",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "type": [
      +          "object",
      +          "null"
      +        ]
      +      },
      +      "type": [
      +        "object",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the readOnly/idempotent annotations by disclosing refresh cadence ('Rebuilt every 5 minutes'), full auth options (Bearer ghk_ key, x402 payment), the free-tier rate limit (500 requests/day), and the exact consequence of no credentials (sample mode, history capped at 50 rows). These are operationally decisive details an agent cannot get from structured fields.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads purpose and usage examples before the auth/billing detail, and every sentence carries real information. The auth paragraph is dense but earn its place given the free-sample and pay-per-call behavior; only slight verbosity keeps it from a 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need no explanation, and the description still covers freshness, auth paths, rate limits, and degraded-mode behavior. Nothing an agent needs to invoke this correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single api_key parameter is fully documented in the schema, including the header-vs-argument preference and sample-mode consequence. The description largely repeats that auth context rather than adding new parameter semantics, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Current headline values for all 25 zones in one call') and immediately contrasts with the per-zone siblings via 'cheapest way to compare zones' and examples like ranking US ISOs. An agent can distinguish this bulk-snapshot tool from get_latest/get_zone_brief without opening a schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides concrete usage scenarios ('which European zone has the lowest price right now', 'rank US ISOs by demand') that clearly convey when this tool is the right pick. It does not, however, explicitly name alternatives (get_latest, get_history) or state exclusions, so routing is implied rather than spelled out.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.