federal_grants
Search Grants.gov for open federal funding opportunities. Agency, eligibility, deadline.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Max results, default 20 | |
| query | No | Keyword search | |
| status | No | open, forecasted |
Search Grants.gov for open federal funding opportunities. Agency, eligibility, deadline.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Max results, default 20 | |
| query | No | Keyword search | |
| status | No | open, forecasted |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations are empty, so description carries full burden. Only hints at parameters ('Agency, eligibility, deadline') but does not disclose behavioral traits like read-only, auth needs, or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no waste, front-loaded with the main action. Extremely concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple search tool with 3 parameters, but lacks mention of return format, pagination, or authentication. Could be more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds 'Agency, eligibility, deadline' which are not explicit parameters, providing marginal context beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool searches Grants.gov for open federal funding opportunities, which is a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling search tools for other data sources.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no context or exclusions provided among many sibling search tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.