business_days
Business days calculator.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| end_date | No | ||
| days_ahead | No | ||
| start_date | No |
Business days calculator.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| end_date | No | ||
| days_ahead | No | ||
| start_date | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It fails to explain how business days are calculated (e.g., which days are considered weekend/holiday), whether start and end dates are inclusive, or what happens if days_ahead is used.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise but at the expense of essential information. It consists of only three words, which is insufficient for an agent to understand how to use the tool correctly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, no annotations, and three undocumented parameters, the description is completely inadequate. The tool's behavior, inputs, and outputs are all unclear, leaving an AI agent with no actionable guidance.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description adds no meaning to the parameters. It does not explain the role of start_date, end_date, or days_ahead, nor their allowed formats or relationships.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Business days calculator' indicates the general domain but is vague. It does not specify whether the tool calculates the number of business days between two dates, adds business days to a date, or something else. Given the input schema with start_date, end_date, and days_ahead, the exact operation is ambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool versus any of the many sibling tools. There is no context about typical use cases or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.