hoodly_robinhood_daily_brief
Read-only briefing combining new Robinhood launches and 24-hour trending data.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| launchLimit | No | ||
| trendingLimit | No |
Read-only briefing combining new Robinhood launches and 24-hour trending data.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| launchLimit | No | ||
| trendingLimit | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Only behavioral trait disclosed is 'Read-only', which indicates no side effects. No annotations exist, so description carries full burden; it fails to mention authorization needs, rate limits, or output format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise but lacks key information. Conciseness alone does not make it effective.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, no output schema, and 0% parameter documentation, the description is severely incomplete. A combining tool needs to explain what the output contains and how limits affect it.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has 0% description coverage and the description does not mention the parameters (launchLimit, trendingLimit) or their meaning. The agent is left to guess what these limits control.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it provides a read-only briefing combining Robinhood launches and trending data. This distinguishes it from separate tools for launches and trending, though it doesn't explicitly name siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this combined tool versus the individual launch or trending tools. Does not mention prerequisites or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.