Skip to main content
Glama

Get findtime.io help

get_findtime_help
Read-onlyIdempotent

Returns findtime.io MCP usage help, supported time-intelligence intents, answer examples, and ambiguity examples. Local package results also include installation and deployment configuration.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_findtime_help"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
_endUserIdNoOptional opaque per-call end-user attribution token populated by the MCP host, not the LLM. Accepts a non-PII hash or token, excluding raw email addresses, names, or platform user IDs.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuine context beyond that: the specific content categories returned and the conditional note that local package results also include installation/deployment configuration.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, content categories front-loaded, with the conditional local-package caveat placed last. No filler or restatement of the title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-required-parameter help tool with no output schema, the description adequately enumerates what comes back and annotations cover safety. It could still say a bit more about format or size of the returned help, but nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single parameter (_endUserId) is fully documented as a host-populated, non-PII token, so the schema does the work. The description adds nothing about parameters, which is acceptable given the baseline but not value-adding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb ('Returns') and enumerates the resource contents: usage help, supported intents, answer examples, and ambiguity examples. No sibling tool overlaps with a help/docs role, so an agent can identify it immediately.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied by the word 'help' – an agent can infer it should call this to learn the toolset, but the description never states when to call it (e.g. before first use, when an intent is unsupported) or when a sibling would be better. No exclusions or triggers are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.