Skip to main content
Glama

Hermoso

by io.github.hermoso-ai

List a connector’s accounts

list_connector_accounts
Read-only

Show every identity a connected account can act as, and which ones this BRAND is currently allowed to use — Facebook Pages + Instagram + Meta ad accounts, Google Ads customers, LinkedIn company Pages (and the personal profile), Pinterest ad accounts, Microsoft Advertising accounts. One person often administers several; only the ticked ones can be posted to or spent from. Call this before set_connector_accounts, and let the USER pick — never guess. Providers: meta, google_ads, linkedin, pinterest_ads, linkedin_ads, reddit_ads, apple_ads, microsoft_ads, google_business, google_analytics, snapchat_ads, x_ads, tiktok_ads, google_tag_manager, google_search_console, bing_webmaster. Read-only, free.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
providerYeswhich connector’s accounts to list

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already state readOnlyHint and destructiveHint, but the description adds context that accounts can have multiple identities and that only ticked ones are usable for posting or spending. It also explains the 'allowed to use' concept and provides a provider list, adding value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-organized paragraph that front-loads the purpose, gives examples, then usage guidance, then provider list. It is reasonably concise given the amount of context it conveys.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With a single parameter and no output schema, the description explains what the tool returns (identities and allowed status) and how to use it (before set_connector_accounts). It covers the provider list and safety (read-only). It is complete for an agent to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only gives a one-line description for provider. The description adds examples for some providers (e.g., Facebook Pages, Google Ads customers) and enumerates all provider values in prose, giving context beyond the bare enum. While it doesn't describe each provider individually, it provides additional meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists identities a connected account can act as and which ones the brand is allowed to use. It distinguishes from set_connector_accounts by referencing it as the next step, and from list_connectors by focusing on accounts within a connector.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'Call this before set_connector_accounts' and instructs to let the user pick, never guess. This provides clear when-to-use and directs to an alternative tool. Also notes it's read-only and free, which helps decide.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Hermoso toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

With 293 tools, the surface is enormous and many tools have overlapping purposes—multiple posting tools (post_to_meta, post_to_linkedin, schedule_post, etc.), multiple analytics tools per channel, and several search tools (search_meta_ads, search_instagram, search_reddit...). While each description is detailed, the volume makes it difficult for an agent to reliably distinguish between similar tools without careful reading, leading to frequent misselection.

Naming Consistency4/5

The naming is largely consistent with a verb_noun pattern (post_to_*, list_*, create_*, delete_*, update_*, manage_*). There are clear families for major operations. A few outliers like 'google_business_account', 'hermoso_capabilities', and 'store_get' break the pattern, but the overwhelming majority follow a predictable structure, making navigation somewhat easier.

Tool Count1/5

293 tools is far beyond any reasonable scope for a single MCP server, even for a comprehensive marketing platform. The calibration guide flags 50+ as an extreme mismatch, and this is nearly six times that threshold. Such a large surface overwhelms context windows, increases the probability of misselection, and makes it impractical for agents to learn or use effectively.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers a vast domain: ad creation and rendering, posting across nine+ social channels, analytics and reporting, file management (Drive/OneDrive), competitor research, brand management, and more. It appears to provide CRUD and lifecycle coverage for most resources. While there may be minor gaps given the immense scope, the overall coverage is impressively comprehensive.

Resources