Skip to main content
Glama

Hermoso

by io.github.hermoso-ai

List Google business listings

list_business_locations
Read-only

List the Google Business Profile listings SHARED WITH THIS BRAND — id, title, address, website and Maps link. These are the only listings anything here can post to or read: one Google login often manages several businesses (an agency manages its clients’), and the user ticks which of them belong to this brand. Call this before posting whenever more than one is shared and let the USER pick: a Post on the wrong storefront is a public mistake Hermoso will not make for them. If nothing is shared, ask the user to choose — list_connector_accounts("google_business") then set_connector_accounts — and never name or guess a listing. Read-only, 0 credits. Needs Google Business Profile connected (Settings ▸ Connectors ▸ Google Business Profile).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds substantial behavioral context beyond the annotations: it explains the multi-business nuance (one login manages several businesses, user ticks which belong to brand), states it's read-only and 0 credits, and notes the prerequisite (Google Business Profile connected). This goes well beyond the readOnlyHint/openWorldHint annotations and prepares the agent for the actual behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Though the description is long, every sentence earns its place. It front-loads the core purpose and return fields, then provides usage guidance, error handling, and prerequisites. The structure flows logically from what → when → what-if, with no filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no parameters and no output schema, so the description must carry the full burden of explaining invocation and results. It covers return fields, the notion of brand-shared listings, when to call it, what to do in the empty case, and connection requirements. Nothing an agent needs to correctly invoke this tool is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are 0 parameters, and the schema is empty (100% coverage), so the baseline is 4. The description adds value by explaining what the tool returns (id, title, address, website, Maps link) and the context of shared listings, which aids in understanding the tool's purpose even though no parameters need explanation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists Google Business Profile listings shared with the brand, specifies the returned fields (id, title, address, website, Maps link), and distinguishes it from sibling list tools by emphasizing it's the only source for brand-shared listings. This is a specific verb+resource with clear scope, and it differentiates from related tools like list_google_business_posts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly tells the agent when to call this tool ('Call this before posting whenever more than one is shared'), what to do if nothing is shared (use list_connector_accounts then set_connector_accounts), and instructs to never name or guess a listing. It also names the alternative tools for the error case, providing clear decision guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Hermoso toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

With 293 tools, the surface is enormous and many tools have overlapping purposes—multiple posting tools (post_to_meta, post_to_linkedin, schedule_post, etc.), multiple analytics tools per channel, and several search tools (search_meta_ads, search_instagram, search_reddit...). While each description is detailed, the volume makes it difficult for an agent to reliably distinguish between similar tools without careful reading, leading to frequent misselection.

Naming Consistency4/5

The naming is largely consistent with a verb_noun pattern (post_to_*, list_*, create_*, delete_*, update_*, manage_*). There are clear families for major operations. A few outliers like 'google_business_account', 'hermoso_capabilities', and 'store_get' break the pattern, but the overwhelming majority follow a predictable structure, making navigation somewhat easier.

Tool Count1/5

293 tools is far beyond any reasonable scope for a single MCP server, even for a comprehensive marketing platform. The calibration guide flags 50+ as an extreme mismatch, and this is nearly six times that threshold. Such a large surface overwhelms context windows, increases the probability of misselection, and makes it impractical for agents to learn or use effectively.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers a vast domain: ad creation and rendering, posting across nine+ social channels, analytics and reporting, file management (Drive/OneDrive), competitor research, brand management, and more. It appears to provide CRUD and lifecycle coverage for most resources. While there may be minor gaps given the immense scope, the overall coverage is impressively comprehensive.

Resources