Skip to main content
Glama

Hermoso

by io.github.hermoso-ai

Create a OneDrive folder

create_onedrive_folder

Create a folder in the user’s OneDrive (optionally nested under parentId) to organize saved files. Returns the folder id + webViewLink. Use that id as update_onedrive_file’s moveToFolderId or as parentId for a nested folder. NOTE: save_to_onedrive’s folder is a NAME (find-or-created), not this id.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesfolder name
parentIdNoparent folder id for a nested folder (default: OneDrive root)

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint false, so mutation is expected. Description adds that it returns folder id and webViewLink, and clarifies nesting behavior. Does not disclose idempotency behavior (e.g., duplicates on repeat), but annotations already indicate it's not idempotent. Adds context beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences with clear structure, front-loaded with the core action, then returns and usage. No redundant phrasing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple create operation with two parameters, the description covers purpose, return value, and cross-tool usage. It could mention behavior on existing folder names, but that's a minor gap. Overall adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema describes both parameters clearly (name, parentId with default root). Description reiterates nesting but doesn't add new semantics beyond schema. Since schema coverage is 100%, description adds minimal extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (create) and resource (folder in user's OneDrive), mentions optional nesting, and distinguishes from related tools by naming save_to_onedrive and update_onedrive_file. Clear purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells how to use the returned id with update_onedrive_file and for nested folders, and clarifies that save_to_onedrive uses a name, not this id. This helps the agent choose the correct tool. Does not explicitly contrast with create_drive_folder but the name implies the service.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Hermoso toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

With 293 tools, the surface is enormous and many tools have overlapping purposes—multiple posting tools (post_to_meta, post_to_linkedin, schedule_post, etc.), multiple analytics tools per channel, and several search tools (search_meta_ads, search_instagram, search_reddit...). While each description is detailed, the volume makes it difficult for an agent to reliably distinguish between similar tools without careful reading, leading to frequent misselection.

Naming Consistency4/5

The naming is largely consistent with a verb_noun pattern (post_to_*, list_*, create_*, delete_*, update_*, manage_*). There are clear families for major operations. A few outliers like 'google_business_account', 'hermoso_capabilities', and 'store_get' break the pattern, but the overwhelming majority follow a predictable structure, making navigation somewhat easier.

Tool Count1/5

293 tools is far beyond any reasonable scope for a single MCP server, even for a comprehensive marketing platform. The calibration guide flags 50+ as an extreme mismatch, and this is nearly six times that threshold. Such a large surface overwhelms context windows, increases the probability of misselection, and makes it impractical for agents to learn or use effectively.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers a vast domain: ad creation and rendering, posting across nine+ social channels, analytics and reporting, file management (Drive/OneDrive), competitor research, brand management, and more. It appears to provide CRUD and lifecycle coverage for most resources. While there may be minor gaps given the immense scope, the overall coverage is impressively comprehensive.

Resources