Skip to main content
Glama

mcp-knowledge

by io.github.getgapup

seo_keyword_research

Read-only

SEO keyword research from a seed keyword or topic. Uses Google Suggest (public, keyless) to discover related queries at 2 expansion levels, then clusters them by intent: informational / commercial / transactional / navigational — via heuristic pattern matching. Search volume is bucketed (very_high / high / medium / low / very_low) and clearly labelled as ESTIMATED — no fabricated precise numbers. Returns all keywords, intent clusters, quality scores (0-100), and top 10 opportunities. Supports country (gl) and language (hl) targeting. 100% keyless. Cache TTL 6h. ICP: SEO managers, content strategists, SaaS founders, agency teams.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
asyncNoIf true, returns a job_id immediately (<200ms) instead of waiting for the result. Poll the result with job_result(job_id). Use for slow tools to avoid client timeouts.
countryNoISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code for Google Suggest (e.g. 'US', 'FR', 'DE'). Defaults to 'US'.
languageNoBCP-47 language code for suggestions (e.g. 'en', 'fr', 'de', 'es'). Defaults to 'en'.
seed_keywordYesThe seed keyword or topic to research (e.g. 'invoice software', 'project management tool')

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
statusYes
countryYes
clustersYes
languageYes
warningsYes
all_keywordsYes
seed_keywordYes
quality_scoreYes
total_keywordsYes
top_opportunitiesYes

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations (readOnlyHint, openWorldHint), the description discloses key behaviors: uses public Google Suggest, heuristic intent clustering, estimated bucketed volume, caching TTL 6h, and no fabricated numbers. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured paragraph that front-loads the main purpose, then adds details without redundancy. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema, the description adequately covers source, methodology, output components, limitations (estimated volume), and use cases. It is fully complete for an effective agent invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with all four parameters described. The description adds context about the async parameter and default values for country and language, improving understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool performs SEO keyword research from a seed keyword, using Google Suggest, clustering by intent, and providing estimated search volume. It distinguishes itself from many sibling tools like competitive_deep_dive and content_discovery.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description identifies the ICP (SEO managers, content strategists, etc.) and mentions use cases like content planning and topic discovery, but does not explicitly contrast with sibling tools. This is clear enough for most agents.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All mcp-knowledge toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

C2.8/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Many tools have overlapping purposes, especially in competitive intelligence, ESG, and risk assessment. For example, there are multiple tools for competitor analysis (competitive_deep_dive, competitor_intel, competitor_moves, etc.) with unclear boundaries. Agents would struggle to select the correct tool without deep understanding of subtle differences.

Naming Consistency2/5

Tool names are a mix of English and French, and follow no consistent pattern. Some use snake_case (e.g., abm_architect, action_plan_esg), while others are verb-focused (e.g., content_catalog, fx_rate). The lack of a uniform naming convention makes it hard for agents to predict tool names.

Tool Count1/5

With 271 tools, the server is excessively large. Even for a broad knowledge domain, this number of tools makes discovery and selection inefficient. Typical coherent servers have 3-15 tools; this has an order of magnitude more, indicating poor scoping.

Completeness3/5

The tool set covers many domains (compliance, finance, marketing, HR, etc.), but the coverage is uneven due to redundancy. Key areas have multiple overlapping tools, while some sub-domains may still have gaps. Overall, the surface is broad but not well-curated.

Resources