Dynamoi

Apply for Music Distribution

dynamoi_apply_for_distribution

Idempotent

Submit an artist's application for Dynamoi music distribution after the user explicitly asks to apply and all five eligibility requirements are met. This records an application for manual review; it does not approve distribution, accept an agreement, submit a release, transfer rights, configure splits or tax forms, or deliver music to stores. All three valid ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country or territory codes, an adult signer attestation, confirmApplicationSubmission=true, and a concise userIntentSummary are required. Country, tax, payout, sanctions, and provider-delivery checks remain manual progression gates after intake; a valid code does not imply approval. Repeated submission is idempotent for an active application.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`artistId`	Yes
`payoutCountry`	Yes
`applicantCountry`	Yes
`userIntentSummary`	Yes
`taxResidencyCountry`	Yes
`adultSignerAttestation`	Yes
`confirmApplicationSubmission`	Yes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`code`	No
`data`	No
`kind`	No
`field`	No
`status`	Yes
`draftId`	No
`message`	No
`retryable`	No
`nextAction`	No
`failureStage`	No
`prerequisite`	No
`screeningResult`	No
`retryAfterSeconds`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedOct 6, 2026

changedOutput schema / properties / code / enum

Previous value: -[
-  "ACCOUNT_READ_ONLY",
-  "INVALID_SPOTIFY_SOURCE",
-  "CAPABILITY_REQUIRED",
-  "INSUFFICIENT_SCOPE",
-  "STATE_CONFLICT",
-  "QUOTE_CHANGED",
-  "RATE_LIMITED",
-  "OUTPUT_INVALID",
-  "UNKNOWN_EFFECT"
-]New value: +[
+  "ACCOUNT_READ_ONLY",
+  "INVALID_SPOTIFY_SOURCE",
+  "CAPABILITY_REQUIRED",
+  "INSUFFICIENT_SCOPE",
+  "TENANT_ACCESS_DENIED",
+  "STATE_CONFLICT",
+  "QUOTE_CHANGED",
+  "RATE_LIMITED",
+  "OUTPUT_INVALID",
+  "UNKNOWN_EFFECT"
+]

Changed3 schema fields changedSep 24, 2026

addedOutput schema / properties / draftId

Added value: +{
+  "format": "uuid",
+  "pattern": "^([0-9a-fA-F]{8}-[0-9a-fA-F]{4}-[1-8][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[89abAB][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[0-9a-fA-F]{12}|00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000|ffffffff-ffff-ffff-ffff-ffffffffffff)$",
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / failureStage

Added value: +{
+  "maxLength": 120,
+  "minLength": 1,
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / screeningResult

Added value: +{
+  "maxLength": 120,
+  "minLength": 1,
+  "type": "string"
+}

Changed2 schema fields changedSep 23, 2026

removedInput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"

removedOutput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"

Changed2 schema fields changedSep 20, 2026

addedInput schema / $schema

Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"

addedOutput schema / $schema

Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"

Changed6 schema fields changedSep 10, 2026

addedOutput schema / properties / code

Added value: +{
+  "enum": [
+    "ACCOUNT_READ_ONLY",
+    "INVALID_SPOTIFY_SOURCE",
+    "CAPABILITY_REQUIRED",
+    "INSUFFICIENT_SCOPE",
+    "STATE_CONFLICT",
+    "QUOTE_CHANGED",
+    "RATE_LIMITED",
+    "OUTPUT_INVALID",
+    "UNKNOWN_EFFECT"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / field

Added value: +{
+  "maxLength": 120,
+  "minLength": 1,
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / nextAction

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "field": {
+      "maxLength": 120,
+      "minLength": 1,
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "kind": {
+      "enum": [
+        "provide_input",
+        "read_status",
+        "reconnect",
+        "handoff"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "reason": {
+      "maxLength": 240,
+      "minLength": 1,
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "kind"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / prerequisite

Added value: +{
+  "maxLength": 240,
+  "minLength": 1,
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / retryAfterSeconds

Added value: +{
+  "maximum": 86400,
+  "minimum": 0,
+  "type": "integer"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / retryable
```
Added value: +{
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
```

AddedAug 25, 2026

TDQS

A4.9/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With annotations only declaring readOnly/idiompotent/destructive/openWorld hints, the description adds substantial flow context: this records an application for manual review, downstream country/tax/payout/sanctions/provider-delivery checks remain manual progression gates, and a valid code does not imply approval. This goes well beyond the structured annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the purpose, then exclusions, then hard requirements, then downstream gates, then idempotency. Every clause earns its place; the density reflects genuinely load-bearing constraints rather than padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be explained, and the description fully covers the high-complexity concerns an agent needs: preconditions, required inputs, manual-review nature, and idempotency. It is complete for a mutating, gate-heavy application tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry the burden, and it does: it clarifies that all three country fields are valid ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 codes, that adult signer attestation and confirmApplicationSubmission=true are required, and that userIntentSummary should be concise. It leaves artistId implicit, which is a minor gap given the obvious resource reference.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Submit an artist's application for Dynamoi music distribution') and immediately delimits scope against adjacent actions (approving, accepting agreements, submitting releases, transferring rights, configuring splits/tax, delivering to stores). An agent can clearly distinguish this from get_distribution_application and other siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit preconditions ('after the user explicitly asks to apply and all five eligibility requirements are met') and explicit non-goals ('it does not approve distribution, accept an agreement, submit a release...'). It also notes idempotent behavior on repeat submission, so the agent knows when re-invoking is safe. Nothing important is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Dynamoi tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.