Skip to main content
Glama

Verify readiness fix

verify_readiness_fix

Re-check a fix without a full scan. With opportunity_id, re-checks an inbox readiness task; the result updates the task. With check_id, re-checks that open finding on its affected pages. Returns pending with the re-check's id; follow it with get_operation or get_readiness_finding's check_request_id. Cost: by opportunity_id free, once every 10 minutes; by check_id one of the plan's monthly re-checks.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
brandYesBrand or study: its ID from list_brands, or its exact name. A partial name is refused.
check_idNoA check ID from get_readiness.
opportunity_idNoA readiness opportunity ID from list_opportunities.
idempotency_keyYesA unique key for this intended action. Reuse it with identical arguments when retrying: the write is not made again, and the reply is the first call's resource as saved (replayed: true) with current status; read tools show the resource's current state. Use a new key for another action.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
generated_atYesRFC 3339 time the response was made.
schema_versionYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / cost / properties / content_generations / description
      Previous value: -"Content Studio generations used from the plan's allowance."New value: +"Content Studio pages or outreach drafts used from the plan's allowance."
  2. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / brand / description
      Previous value: -"Brand or study: its ID from list_brands, or its name."New value: +"Brand or study: its ID from list_brands, or its exact name. A partial name is refused."
    • changedInput schema / properties / idempotency_key / description
      Previous value: -"A unique key for this intended action. Reuse it with identical arguments when retrying; use a new key for another action."New value: +"A unique key for this intended action. Reuse it with identical arguments when retrying: the write is not made again, and the reply is the first call's resource as saved (replayed: true) with current status; read tools show the resource's current state. Use a new key for another action."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / brand / description
      Previous value: -"The brand written to; null for brand setup before approval."New value: +"The brand written to; null for start_brand_setup, which has no brand yet."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / cost / properties / readiness_scans / description
      Previous value: -"Site readiness scans used from the plan's monthly allowance."New value: +"Full site readiness scans started; counted for the month, with no monthly allowance."
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / created_at
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Set on a replay: when the original call was made.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / replayed / description
      Previous value: -"True when this repeats an earlier call with the same idempotency_key."New value: +"True when this repeats an earlier call with the same idempotency_key. The write is not made again: resource is as first saved, status, progress and message are current, and the read tools show the resource's current state."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "properties": {
      +        "brand": {
      +          "additionalProperties": false,
      +          "description": "The brand written to; null for brand setup before approval.",
      +          "properties": {
      +            "id": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "name": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "url": {
      +              "description": "The brand's website, or empty when none is set.",
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "id",
      +            "name",
      +            "url"
      +          ],
      +          "type": [
      +            "null",
      +            "object"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "cost": {
      +          "additionalProperties": false,
      +          "description": "What the write used from the plan's capacity, allowances and model budget; null when nothing.",
      +          "properties": {
      +            "content_generations": {
      +              "description": "Content Studio generations used from the plan's allowance.",
      +              "type": "integer"
      +            },
      +            "model_budget": {
      +              "description": "Whether the call spends the organisation's AI model budget.",
      +              "type": "boolean"
      +            },
      +            "note": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "prompt_capacity": {
      +              "description": "Active prompts added against the plan's prompt limit.",
      +              "type": "integer"
      +            },
      +            "queued_model_runs": {
      +              "description": "Answer collections queued; each uses model budget.",
      +              "type": "integer"
      +            },
      +            "readiness_checks": {
      +              "description": "Readiness re-checks used from the plan's monthly allowance.",
      +              "type": "integer"
      +            },
      +            "readiness_scans": {
      +              "description": "Site readiness scans used from the plan's monthly allowance.",
      +              "type": "integer"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "model_budget",
      +            "content_generations",
      +            "readiness_scans",
      +            "readiness_checks",
      +            "prompt_capacity",
      +            "queued_model_runs",
      +            "note"
      +          ],
      +          "type": [
      +            "null",
      +            "object"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "message": {
      +          "description": "What happens next.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "operation_id": {
      +          "description": "Pass to get_operation to follow the write.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "poll_after_seconds": {
      +          "description": "While pending, how long to wait before calling get_operation; 0 otherwise.",
      +          "type": "integer"
      +        },
      +        "progress": {
      +          "additionalProperties": false,
      +          "description": "Set while the work runs.",
      +          "properties": {
      +            "done": {
      +              "type": "integer"
      +            },
      +            "message": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "stage": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "total": {
      +              "description": "0 when the total is not known.",
      +              "type": "integer"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "stage",
      +            "done",
      +            "total",
      +            "message"
      +          ],
      +          "type": [
      +            "null",
      +            "object"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "replayed": {
      +          "description": "True when this repeats an earlier call with the same idempotency_key.",
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        },
      +        "resource": {
      +          "additionalProperties": false,
      +          "properties": {
      +            "check_id": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "completed_at": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "created_at": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "error": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "id": {
      +              "description": "The check_request_id get_readiness_finding takes.",
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "per_url": {
      +              "items": {
      +                "additionalProperties": false,
      +                "properties": {
      +                  "status": {
      +                    "type": "string"
      +                  },
      +                  "url": {
      +                    "type": "string"
      +                  }
      +                },
      +                "required": [
      +                  "url",
      +                  "status"
      +                ],
      +                "type": "object"
      +              },
      +              "type": "array"
      +            },
      +            "recharges_at": {
      +              "description": "When the re-check's charge returns to the monthly allowance; empty when it used none.",
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "resolved": {
      +              "description": "Whether the issue is fixed; null until complete.",
      +              "type": [
      +                "null",
      +                "boolean"
      +              ]
      +            },
      +            "status": {
      +              "description": "queued, processing, complete, or failed.",
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "id",
      +            "check_id",
      +            "status",
      +            "resolved",
      +            "per_url",
      +            "error",
      +            "created_at",
      +            "completed_at",
      +            "recharges_at"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "status": {
      +          "description": "completed: done. pending: saved, with work still running; call get_operation after poll_after_seconds. failed: the work after the write failed; message says why.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "operation_id",
      +        "status",
      +        "replayed",
      +        "brand",
      +        "resource",
      +        "progress",
      +        "poll_after_seconds",
      +        "message",
      +        "cost"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "generated_at": {
      +      "description": "RFC 3339 time the response was made.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "schema_version": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "schema_version",
      +    "generated_at",
      +    "data"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. Added

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare the safety profile (not read-only, not destructive, open-world); the description goes well beyond them by disclosing the side effect (the result updates the task), the pending return state plus the id to track it, and non-obvious operating limits (free once per 10 minutes by opportunity_id; consumes one monthly re-check by check_id).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, then mode behavior, then the return/follow-up and cost. Nothing is padding; every clause carries information an agent needs.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite an output schema existing, the description still supplies the pending-status contract and the tracking IDs, and it covers the mutation side effect, follow-up path, and rate limits. Nothing material is missing for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds real meaning by explaining what each ID selector actually does (inbox task re-check vs open-finding re-check on affected pages). It does not add format or validity detail beyond the schema, so it stays below 5.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (re-check/verify) and resource (a readiness fix), and splits it into two clearly named modes keyed on opportunity_id vs check_id. An agent can distinguish it from run_readiness_scan ('without a full scan') and from get_readiness without opening a schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the caller: use opportunity_id to re-check an inbox readiness task, use check_id to re-check an open finding on its affected pages, and contrasts both against a full scan. It also names the follow-up tools (get_operation, get_readiness_finding's check_request_id) and gives the cost/rate gating for each mode.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources