Skip to main content
Glama

Cleotic

by io.github.generaldataworks
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Comment on opportunity

comment_on_opportunity

Add a comment to an opportunity as you.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyYesThe comment.
brandYesBrand or study: its ID from list_brands, or its exact name. A partial name is refused.
opportunity_idYesOpportunity ID from list_opportunities.
idempotency_keyYesA unique key for this intended action. Reuse it with identical arguments when retrying: the write is not made again, and the reply is the first call's resource as saved (replayed: true) with current status; read tools show the resource's current state. Use a new key for another action.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
generated_atYesRFC 3339 time the response was made.
schema_versionYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / cost / properties / content_generations / description
      Previous value: -"Content Studio generations used from the plan's allowance."New value: +"Content Studio pages or outreach drafts used from the plan's allowance."
  2. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / brand / description
      Previous value: -"Brand or study: its ID from list_brands, or its name."New value: +"Brand or study: its ID from list_brands, or its exact name. A partial name is refused."
    • changedInput schema / properties / idempotency_key / description
      Previous value: -"A unique key for this intended action. Reuse it with identical arguments when retrying; use a new key for another action."New value: +"A unique key for this intended action. Reuse it with identical arguments when retrying: the write is not made again, and the reply is the first call's resource as saved (replayed: true) with current status; read tools show the resource's current state. Use a new key for another action."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / brand / description
      Previous value: -"The brand written to; null for brand setup before approval."New value: +"The brand written to; null for start_brand_setup, which has no brand yet."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / cost / properties / readiness_scans / description
      Previous value: -"Site readiness scans used from the plan's monthly allowance."New value: +"Full site readiness scans started; counted for the month, with no monthly allowance."
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / created_at
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Set on a replay: when the original call was made.",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / replayed / description
      Previous value: -"True when this repeats an earlier call with the same idempotency_key."New value: +"True when this repeats an earlier call with the same idempotency_key. The write is not made again: resource is as first saved, status, progress and message are current, and the read tools show the resource's current state."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "data": {
+      "additionalProperties": false,
+      "properties": {
+        "brand": {
+          "additionalProperties": false,
+          "description": "The brand written to; null for brand setup before approval.",
+          "properties": {
+            "id": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "name": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "url": {
+              "description": "The brand's website, or empty when none is set.",
+              "type": "string"
+            }
+          },
+          "required": [
+            "id",
+            "name",
+            "url"
+          ],
+          "type": [
+            "null",
+            "object"
+          ]
+        },
+        "cost": {
+          "additionalProperties": false,
+          "description": "What the write used from the plan's capacity, allowances and model budget; null when nothing.",
+          "properties": {
+            "content_generations": {
+              "description": "Content Studio generations used from the plan's allowance.",
+              "type": "integer"
+            },
+            "model_budget": {
+              "description": "Whether the call spends the organisation's AI model budget.",
+              "type": "boolean"
+            },
+            "note": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "prompt_capacity": {
+              "description": "Active prompts added against the plan's prompt limit.",
+              "type": "integer"
+            },
+            "queued_model_runs": {
+              "description": "Answer collections queued; each uses model budget.",
+              "type": "integer"
+            },
+            "readiness_checks": {
+              "description": "Readiness re-checks used from the plan's monthly allowance.",
+              "type": "integer"
+            },
+            "readiness_scans": {
+              "description": "Site readiness scans used from the plan's monthly allowance.",
+              "type": "integer"
+            }
+          },
+          "required": [
+            "model_budget",
+            "content_generations",
+            "readiness_scans",
+            "readiness_checks",
+            "prompt_capacity",
+            "queued_model_runs",
+            "note"
+          ],
+          "type": [
+            "null",
+            "object"
+          ]
+        },
+        "message": {
+          "description": "What happens next.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "operation_id": {
+          "description": "Pass to get_operation to follow the write.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "poll_after_seconds": {
+          "description": "While pending, how long to wait before calling get_operation; 0 otherwise.",
+          "type": "integer"
+        },
+        "progress": {
+          "additionalProperties": false,
+          "description": "Set while the work runs.",
+          "properties": {
+            "done": {
+              "type": "integer"
+            },
+            "message": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "stage": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "total": {
+              "description": "0 when the total is not known.",
+              "type": "integer"
+            }
+          },
+          "required": [
+            "stage",
+            "done",
+            "total",
+            "message"
+          ],
+          "type": [
+            "null",
+            "object"
+          ]
+        },
+        "replayed": {
+          "description": "True when this repeats an earlier call with the same idempotency_key.",
+          "type": "boolean"
+        },
+        "resource": {
+          "additionalProperties": false,
+          "properties": {
+            "author": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "body": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "created_at": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "id": {
+              "type": "string"
+            }
+          },
+          "required": [
+            "id",
+            "body",
+            "author",
+            "created_at"
+          ],
+          "type": "object"
+        },
+        "status": {
+          "description": "completed: done. pending: saved, with work still running; call get_operation after poll_after_seconds. failed: the work after the write failed; message says why.",
+          "type": "string"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "operation_id",
+        "status",
+        "replayed",
+        "brand",
+        "resource",
+        "progress",
+        "poll_after_seconds",
+        "message",
+        "cost"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "generated_at": {
+      "description": "RFC 3339 time the response was made.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "schema_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "schema_version",
+    "generated_at",
+    "data"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}
  4. Added

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, openWorldHint=false and idempotentHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The only behavioral content the description adds is 'as you' (identity attribution); it says nothing about visibility of the comment, permissions required, or how the non-idempotent write behaves, and notably the idempotentHint=false annotation sits oddly beside a required idempotency_key whose replay semantics are only explained in the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler; 'as you' is the one piece of information beyond the title. It is efficient, though arguably too terse for a mutation tool rather than genuinely well-proportioned.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be described, and the schema plus annotations carry the safety and parameter load. What is missing is any statement of when to comment versus other communication siblings and whether the comment is visible to others, which leaves the definition merely adequate for a write tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, including detailed semantics for idempotency_key (reuse on retry, replayed flag) and sourcing of brand/opportunity_id from list_brands/list_opportunities. The description adds no parameter meaning beyond that, so the baseline 3 for a fully-documented schema is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Add a comment to an opportunity') and adds the attribution detail 'as you', so the agent knows the comment is posted under the caller's identity. It is clear, but it does not distinguish this from other write-style siblings (e.g. message_page, act_on_opportunity) or explain the opportunity-centric framing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of alternatives such as message_page or act_on_opportunity for communicating on a record. The agent must infer usage entirely from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Cleotic toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources