Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% and every parameter (symbol, indicator, start_date, end_date) is documented in the schema, so the description adds little parameter-level meaning. It only restates the indicator slug list and urges use of exact slugs, which is already in the schema. Baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.