Skip to main content
Glama

Frontman for WordPress

wc_maint_reset_roles

Destructive

Reset WooCommerce roles and capabilities, replacing existing role configuration. Ask the user for confirmation before calling with confirm=true.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "site_id": "<site_id>",
      "confirm": "<confirm>"
    },
    "name": "wc_maint_reset_roles"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
confirmYesMust be true only after explicit user confirmation.
site_idYesThe connected site's id returned by list_sites. Call list_sites first; do not use a URL or WordPress post ID.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and non-idempotent, and the description adds the replacement semantics (existing role configuration is overwritten) plus a required human-confirmation gate. It stops short of saying whether custom roles/capabilities are permanently lost or whether the operation can be undone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, no padding, with the destructive effect stated first and the confirmation requirement second. Nothing could be removed without losing information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive, non-idempotent mutation with no output schema, the description covers what it replaces and the safety gate, while annotations cover the risk profile. Minor gap: no description of recovery/aftermath or which role configuration is discarded.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and already documents both site_id (from list_sites) and confirm (true only after explicit user confirmation). The description reinforces the confirm workflow but adds no new parameter meaning, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ("Reset WooCommerce roles and capabilities") plus the effect ("replacing existing role configuration"). It is clearly distinguishable from the maintenance clear/delete/regenerate siblings, though it doesn't name any alternative tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides one concrete precondition: ask the user for confirmation before calling with confirm=true. It gives no guidance on when a reset is appropriate versus other role-related operations, nor any when-not/exclusion context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.