Skip to main content
Glama

Frontman for WordPress

wc_maint_delete_taxes

Destructive

Permanently delete all WooCommerce tax rates and their locations. Ask the user for confirmation before calling with confirm=true.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "site_id": "<site_id>",
      "confirm": "<confirm>"
    },
    "name": "wc_maint_delete_taxes"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
confirmYesMust be true only after explicit user confirmation.
site_idYesThe connected site's id returned by list_sites. Call list_sites first; do not use a URL or WordPress post ID.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=false, so the main safety profile is supplied there. The description adds useful specifics beyond annotations: deletion is permanent, applies to all tax rates and their locations, and requires explicit user confirmation before setting confirm=true.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero waste. The destructive scope is front-loaded, followed immediately by the confirmation requirement.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive maintenance operation with no output schema and fully documented parameters, the definition covers the essential information: what is destroyed, permanence, and the confirmation precondition. It could add a little more detail about operational impact, but nothing critical is missing for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema itself explains that site_id must come from list_sites and that confirm must be true only after explicit user confirmation. The description reinforces the confirmation requirement but adds no parameter semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource: "Permanently delete all WooCommerce tax rates and their locations." This clearly distinguishes the operation from the sibling reporting tool wc_get_taxes_report and from other delete tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives an important usage precondition: ask the user for confirmation before calling with confirm=true. It does not explicitly compare this tool with alternatives or state when not to use it, but the destructive scope is clear enough for correct selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.