Skip to main content
Glama

Frontman for WordPress

wc_get_shipping_zone

Read-onlyIdempotent

Gets one WooCommerce shipping zone. Mirrors woocommerce-mcp-server method get_shipping_zone using local WordPress authentication; no WooCommerce REST API keys are required.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "site_id": "<site_id>",
      "zoneId": "<zoneId>"
    },
    "name": "wc_get_shipping_zone"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
zoneIdYesThe shipping zone ID.
site_idYesThe connected site's id returned by list_sites. Call list_sites first; do not use a URL or WordPress post ID.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely new context about the authentication model (local WordPress auth, no WooCommerce REST API keys), which is useful, but it says nothing about what happens when the zone ID does not exist or what errors surface.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with the purpose front-loaded and zero filler. The second sentence is partly implementation trivia (mirroring an internal method name) but it does carry the auth-relevant payload, so it largely earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a simple two-parameter read tool with rich annotations, and the auth context is covered. However, there is no output schema, and the description does not indicate what a shipping zone record contains or how a missing zone is reported, leaving a real gap for an agent interpreting the result.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both zoneId and site_id documented in the schema, including the list_sites prerequisite. The description adds no syntax, format, or constraint detail beyond that, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Gets one WooCommerce shipping zone'), and the word 'one' signals a single-record fetch, contrasting implicitly with the plural list sibling wc_get_shipping_zones. It stops short of naming that sibling explicitly, so differentiation is inferred rather than stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and no named alternative for retrieving many zones versus one. The only prerequisite ('Call list_sites first') lives in the input schema, not the description, so the description itself contributes no routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.