Skip to main content
Glama

Frontman for WordPress

wc_get_coupons

Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieves WooCommerce coupons with pagination and filters. Mirrors woocommerce-mcp-server method get_coupons using local WordPress authentication; no WooCommerce REST API keys are required.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "site_id": "<site_id>"
    },
    "name": "wc_get_coupons"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number. Default 1.
filtersNoWooCommerce REST API filters to pass through.
perPageNoNumber of results per page. Default 10, max 100.
site_idYesThe connected site's id returned by list_sites. Call list_sites first; do not use a URL or WordPress post ID.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint false, closed-world), so the bar is lower. The description still earns credit for disclosing an auth requirement beyond the annotations: it works through local WordPress authentication and requires no WooCommerce REST API keys, which materially affects whether an agent can call it. It stops short of describing the return shape or paging behavior at the boundary.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero filler, with the core capability front-loaded ahead of the authentication note. Nothing is repeated or padded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Safety annotations and a fully documented schema carry most of the load, so this is adequate for a list tool. However, the filters parameter is an open object with no documented keys and the description gives no hint of which WooCommerce filter fields are valid, which is the main gap an agent would hit when calling it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents page, perPage, site_id, and the filters passthrough, making 3 the baseline. The description merely restates that pagination and filters exist without adding filter-key syntax or semantics beyond what the schema supplies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: "Retrieves WooCommerce coupons with pagination and filters." That clearly distinguishes it from report or maintenance siblings, but it never names the singular sibling wc_get_coupon, so an agent must infer that this tool returns a collection rather than one coupon.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and no alternative tool is named. The only procedural instruction ("Call list_sites first") lives in the site_id schema field rather than in the description, so the description itself offers no routing help between this and siblings like wc_get_coupon or wc_get_coupons_report.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.