Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

fresh-feeds — trending/new/changed MCP servers + x402 change-data API

by io.github.foomworks
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

verify_mcp_server_report

PAID (x402): returns x402 payment instructions for the FULL verification report (LIVE endpoint probe + component breakdown) for one registry MCP server.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "server": "<server>"
    },
    "name": "verify_mcp_server_report"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
serverYesMCP registry server name

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It usefully reveals that the tool is PAID (x402) and that it returns payment instructions rather than the report itself. However, it does not explain what happens after payment, whether the operation is reversible, or any side effects, leaving significant gaps for a payment-related tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that immediately front-loads the 'PAID' nature and clearly states the core function. Every word earns its place, with no filler or redundant phrasing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema, so the description does explain the return value (x402 payment instructions). However, it lacks details on what the instructions contain, how to complete payment, and how this relates to verify_mcp_server, leaving the agent with important unanswered questions about using the tool in a workflow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides full coverage with a clear description for the 'server' parameter. The tool description's phrase 'for one registry MCP server' aligns with the schema but adds no new meaning or syntax details, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns x402 payment instructions for the full verification report of one registry MCP server. It explicitly mentions the report includes a LIVE endpoint probe and component breakdown, which distinguishes it from the sibling tool verify_mcp_server that likely runs the verification itself.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context by indicating it's a PAID operation and that it's for the FULL report, hinting that a lighter or free option may exist. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like verify_mcp_server, nor does it provide any exclusion criteria or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All fresh-feeds — trending/new/changed MCP servers + x402 change-data API toolsInspect
Try in Browser
Claude Code, inside the Godot 4 editorFlockbay puts an AI agent in the real Godot 4 editor: it writes GDScript, runs your game and fixes what breaks. Free, or bring your own Claude Code or Codex.flockbay.comAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources