Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description emphasizes the essential CRD parameter and where to obtain it, which adds modest semantic value. However, with schema description coverage reported as 0% at the top level, the description does not compensate for the many optional parameters like filters, resumability, or display fields, leaving that burden to the nested schema descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.