Skip to main content
Glama

Earthquakes: global M4.5+ in the last 24 h, significant events of the week (USGS)

get_earthquakes
Read-only

Open USGS earthquake data: count of global earthquakes of magnitude 4.5 and above in the last 24 hours, the strongest one (time, magnitude, place, depth), and USGS 'significant' events of the last 7 days. It is a record, not a forecast: earthquakes cannot be predicted. Smaller events are not included; magnitudes can be revised by USGS. Refreshed every 5 minutes.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_earthquakes"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnly/openWorld annotations, the description discloses refresh cadence (every 5 minutes), that USGS may revise magnitudes, the exclusion threshold of M4.5, and the retrospective nature of the data. With no output schema present, these caveats carry real weight for interpreting results correctly.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The four sentences are dense but each earns its place, and the primary payload is front-loaded ahead of the caveats. No filler or restatement of the title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, read-only feed with no output schema, the description supplies everything needed: what is returned, freshness, revision caveats, and completeness limits. Nothing an agent needs to invoke or interpret it is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing to disambiguate; baseline is 4. The description correctly implies a parameter-free fixed query rather than suggesting configurable filters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the resource (USGS earthquake data) and enumerates the exact payload: count of global M4.5+ quakes in 24h, the strongest event with time/magnitude/place/depth, and significant events over 7 days. That specificity distinguishes it from generic siblings like get_crisis or get_sensors without needing the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It implicitly sets usage boundaries by declaring the tool 'a record, not a forecast' and noting that smaller events are excluded, which steers an agent away from prediction or low-magnitude queries. However, it gives no explicit alternative sibling to use when a different scope is needed, so it falls short of the 5 bar.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.