Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

PAL Commerce & Agent Revenue MCP

by io.github.enricoaboujaoude-droid
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Paid full-catalog AIEO remediation

catalog_remediation_bulk

Generate one prioritized AIEO remediation plan for 1-2,000 product records, improving machine readability for AI shopping and agentic commerce while retaining Merchant Center/feed compatibility. Price: $20.00 USDC via x402.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "records": "<records>"
    },
    "name": "catalog_remediation_bulk"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
recordsYes
payment_signatureNoOptional x402 v2 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE value. Omit it on the first call to receive the live payment requirement; supply the signed value on the second call.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry the full behavioral burden. It usefully discloses pricing ($20.00 USDC via x402), which is real value beyond the schema, but is silent on whether the catalog is modified, whether the operation is reversible, or what permissions/side effects apply.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences, purpose front-loaded, price and delivery mechanism placed at the end. No filler, though 'AIEO' and 'agentic commerce' are undefined jargon that carry little routing value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a paid, no-annotation, no-output-schema tool, the description is only minimum viable: it names the artifact ('one prioritized AIEO remediation plan') but not its shape or delivery, and it does not restate the two-call x402 negotiation an agent must follow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 50%: payment_signature is documented in-schema, while the required 'records' array is not. The description partially compensates by scoping records as product records with a 1-2,000 count, matching minItems/maxItems, but never explains what a record object must contain despite additionalProperties:true.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource (Generate a prioritized AIEO remediation plan) and quantifies scope (1-2,000 product records). However it never names or contrasts with close siblings like catalog_remediation, catalog_remediation_batch, or free_remediation_sample, so an agent must infer the distinction from the 'bulk' name alone.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and no routing to alternatives such as the 'batch' or 'sample' siblings that sound nearly identical. The mention of price/x402 implies a paid flow but does not say when this tool is preferred over a cheaper or free variant.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All PAL Commerce & Agent Revenue MCP toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources