Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only mentions a $0.02 cost. No disclosure of side effects, permissions, rate limits, data scope, or update frequency. A mutation-safe hint is absent, and the cost hint is the only behavioral clue.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise at one sentence plus a cost note. Front-loaded with purpose and cost. However, the brevity sacrifices necessary detail, and there is no structured presentation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, no parameter descriptions, and no annotations, the description is critically incomplete. It fails to explain input requirements, return format, or behavioral traits, making the tool hard to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%; description offers no explanation of the required parameters 'address' and 'api_key'. No format hints, possible values, or purpose beyond the tool name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Token holder distribution analysis from DEX data', specifying the verb (analysis, implied retrieval) and resource (token holder distribution from DEX data). It distinguishes from siblings like get_coin or get_price by focusing on holder distribution and DEX source.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No mention of prerequisites, when not to use, or comparative advice against siblings like get_coin or get_summary.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.