Skip to main content
Glama

Cambio Uruguay

Get rate history

get_evolution
Read-onlyIdempotent

Historical rate series and statistics (min/max/avg/current/change) for a given exchange house (origin) and currency over the last N months. Use list_houses for valid origin ids.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "origin": "<origin>",
      "currency": "<currency>"
    },
    "name": "get_evolution"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
originYesExchange house id, e.g. brou, itau, prex
periodNoMonths of history (default 6)
currencyYesISO currency code, e.g. USD

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive/open-world, so safety is covered. The description adds useful context beyond that: the statistical fields returned (min/max/avg/current/change) and the temporal scoping over the last N months, giving an agent a sense of output content without needing an output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences, front-loaded with the resource and statistical content, followed by the prerequisite. No filler; every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description usefully summarizes the returned statistics and time scope, filling the return-value gap. It's largely complete for a read-only lookup, though it could note period bounds or pagination/edge behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so origin, period, and currency are fully documented in the schema. The description restates the parameter roles (origin, currency, N months) but adds no syntax or format detail beyond the schema's examples, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb/resource: retrieves historical rate series and statistics (min/max/avg/current/change) for a given exchange house and currency over N months. It clearly contrasts with get_rates (current rates) and list_houses (id source) by naming the list_houses relationship, so an agent can distinguish this from siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States the prerequisite 'Use list_houses for valid origin ids', which is a concrete usage direction. However, it doesn't explicitly say when to choose this over get_rates (current rates) or convert, so the alternative-routing is only partially covered.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.