get_booking_profile
Get the Cal.com booking profile, event slug, booking URL, and required fields for agent bookings.
Input Schema
TableJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Raze
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Behavior2/5
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description should disclose behaviors like authentication requirements, read-only nature, or side effects. It only states the output without any behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Conciseness5/5
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, 16 words, directly states the tool's purpose with no extraneous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Completeness4/5
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters and no output schema, the description adequately lists the return items. Could be more detailed on structure but sufficient for a simple tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Parameters4/5
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description does not need to add parameter info.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Purpose5/5
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description specifies the verb 'Get', the resource 'Cal.com booking profile', and lists the specific items returned (event slug, booking URL, required fields). It clearly distinguishes from siblings like 'get_booking_url' by including additional profile details.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Usage Guidelines2/5
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_booking_url'. The description does not provide any usage context, prerequisites, or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Try in Browser
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of Raze's public information or booking functionality. There is no overlap; booking, pricing, projects, resources, and services are clearly separated.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_booking, get_available_slots, list_projects). This makes it easy for an agent to predict tool behavior.
Tool Count5/5
With 10 tools, the server covers the main public-facing aspects of Raze (booking, pricing, projects, resources, services) without being overly heavy or thin. Each tool serves a clear purpose.
Completeness5/5
The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for a company site: booking lifecycle (including slot checking and creation), pricing, project case studies (list and detail), resources, and services. No obvious gaps for the intended public interaction.