Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

knos

by io.github.drexthealpha
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Ready to fund

knos_ready
Read-onlyIdempotent

Checks a brief before any money locks and returns Ready, or the missing fields with a rewrite template, sending nothing.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "brief": "<brief>"
    },
    "name": "knos_ready"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
briefYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world behavior. The description adds meaningful failure behavior ('returns ... missing fields with a rewrite template') and confirms that nothing is sent, though it does not cover permissions or limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It communicates the check, the timing, and the return behavior compactly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description gives purpose and partial return behavior, and annotations cover safety. However, with a nested 'brief' object and no output schema, an agent still lacks guidance on the brief's expected fields and the shape of the missing-field response.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage and defines 'brief' only as an unconstrained object. The description mentions 'brief' and 'missing fields' but does not explain the brief's required structure or field semantics, so it fails to compensate for the schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('checks'), resource ('brief'), and scope ('before any money locks'), making the tool's function clear. It does not explicitly distinguish itself from sibling validation or demand-check tools, so sibling differentiation is missing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear usage context: run this before funding is locked. It does not name alternatives or state when not to use it, so it falls short of explicit when/when-not guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All knos toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources