Skip to main content
Glama

Conta Azul MCP

by io.github.douglac

contaazul_payable_create

Cria um evento financeiro de conta a pagar. data é o JSON do EventoFinanceiroRequest (mesma estrutura do contaazul_receivable_create: data_competencia, valor, observacao, descricao, contato (UUID do fornecedor), conta_financeira (UUID), condicao_pagamento.parcelas[] (cada parcela leva detalhe_valor:{valor_bruto obrigatório; valor_liquido derivado se omitido} — os aliases valor_composicao e composicao_valor são normalizados automaticamente), rateio[] opcional. metodo_pagamento da parcela usa o enum EXATO da API (PIX_PAGAMENTO_INSTANTANEO, BOLETO_BANCARIO, TRANSFERENCIA_BANCARIA, CARTAO_CREDITO, CARTAO_DEBITO, DINHEIRO etc — formas curtas como PIX/BOLETO/TED são normalizadas). Retorna 202 + {protocolId,status} (assíncrono).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
accountNo

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds behavioral details beyond annotations: async return (202), normalization of aliases and enum values. Annotations are basic, so description enhances transparency effectively.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single dense paragraph is front-loaded with purpose, but could be broken into sections for readability. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers return format and async nature, but fails to explain the 'account' parameter. Otherwise complete for a create tool with rich parameter documentation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but description thoroughly explains the 'data' parameter structure, including nested fields, enums with valid values, and alias handling. Adds significant meaning beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Cria um evento financeiro de conta a pagar' (creates an accounts payable financial event) and references sibling tool contaazul_receivable_create for structure similarity, thus distinguishing its purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides detailed parameter usage but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Implicitly unique for payables, but no when-not or comparison to other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Conta Azul MCP toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tools are easily confused: person_write_create/person_write_update and sale_write_create/sale_write_update duplicate the same operation with an internal action flag, and authenticate vs connect both deal with connection setup. Also, list_accounts (company installs) and list_financial_accounts (bank accounts) have similar names but different meanings.

Naming Consistency2/5

Naming patterns vary widely: verb_noun (create_budget, list_people) is mixed with noun_verb (contract_write, person_delete, product_write). The contaazul_ prefix is applied inconsistently, and standalone names like authenticate, connect, marketplace, and toolkit_info break the pattern. Flattened action pairs add redundant, non-idiomatic names.

Tool Count1/5

With 57 tools, this server exceeds the 50+ threshold for an extreme count. The tool list is bloated with generic platform tools (authenticate, marketplace, report_bug) alongside dozens of domain-specific ones, making it overwhelming for agents to parse and select from.

Completeness4/5

The Conta Azul domain is well represented: people, products, services, sales, budgets, contracts, financial accounts, receivables/payables, settlements, charges, invoices, and transfers all have read/create/list operations, and most have update/cancel/delete. Minor gaps like product update/delete or service update exist due to API limitations, but the core workflows are covered.

Resources