Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

Vibes-Coded Agent Tools

by io.github.doteyeso-ops
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

vc_skill_scan_consensus

Read-onlyIdempotent

Reconcile conflicting agent-skill security scanner reports.

Use after running two or more independent scanners. Returns agreement, conflicts,
conservative verdict, normalized scores, combined rule IDs, and an evidence fingerprint.
Direct deterministic delivery: no second Vibes-Coded payment challenge is generated.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "reports": "<reports>"
    },
    "name": "vc_skill_scan_consensus"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
reportsYesTwo to ten reports: {scanner, verdict: allow|review|block, risk_score?, findings?}.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only, idempotent, open-world, and destructive hints. The description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond those annotations by highlighting 'direct deterministic delivery' and 'no second Vibes-Coded payment challenge is generated,' which is not derivable from the structured fields. It does not contradict the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences, each earning its place: the first states the core purpose, the second lists the outputs, and the third addresses execution-relevant behavior. The most important scoping information is front-loaded, with no filler or redundant restatement of the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter, read-only, idempotent consensus operation with a rich schema and an output schema, the description is complete. It specifies when to use the tool, what inputs it expects, what it returns, and the deterministic delivery behavior, leaving no gap an agent needs to fill to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is only one parameter and the schema description documents it fully with the expected shape and a clear two-to-ten range, so schema coverage is 100%. The free-text description reinforces that the input consists of scanner reports but adds no new parameter-level meaning beyond the schema, matching the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb—'Reconcile'—and names the exact resource: conflicting agent-skill security scanner reports. It clearly distinguishes this from the related scan tool by framing it as the post-scan consensus step, so an agent can tell it apart from vc_skill_risk_scan without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells the agent when to use it: 'Use after running two or more independent scanners.' It provides clear usage context by stating the input as multiple scanner reports, but it does not explicitly name alternatives or state when-not-to-use conditions, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Vibes-Coded Agent Tools toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources