Skip to main content
Glama

Vibes-Coded Agent Security and Commerce Tools

by io.github.doteyeso-ops

pay

Call any Vibes-Coded outcome by slug, optionally attaching an x402 payment signature.

Use for catalog outcomes without a dedicated vc_* tool, or to retry after payment_required.
Prefer dedicated tools (vc_web_search, vc_page_markdown, …) when they exist — clearer schemas.
Do not use instead of health().

Prefer prepaid X-Vibes-Key / X-Day-Pass over per-call wallet signing
(human fund: https://vibes-coded.com/start).

Args:
    slug: Outcome id, e.g. "web-search" or "agent-state-guard".
    payment_signature: Optional x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE header value.
    body: JSON object of endpoint fields (query, url, text, …).

Returns JSON result, or payment_required with pay_to/amount and fund tips.
Side effects: may settle USDC via x402 when paying; otherwise HTTP only.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyNoJSON object of endpoint fields (query, url, text, …).
slugYesOutcome id, e.g. web-search or agent-state-guard.
payment_signatureNoOptional x402 PAYMENT-SIGNATURE header value.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the generic annotations, the description discloses real behavioral context: it may settle USDC via x402, can return payment_required with pay_to/amount and fund tips, and is otherwise HTTP-only. This directly addresses side effects and failure modes the annotations do not convey. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact, front-loaded with the core action, and organized into usage, argument, return, and side-effect sections. Every line earns its place, including the fallback routing and payment preference guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's generic open-world nature, the description covers purpose, when to use it, alternatives, exclusions, payment mechanics, return behavior, and side effects. An output schema exists for return shape, so nothing critical is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents all three parameters at 100% coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description adds a few useful examples (slug values, body field types) but mostly restates the schema without materially extending parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Call any Vibes-Coded outcome by slug.' It explicitly distinguishes the tool from siblings by noting it is for catalog outcomes without a dedicated vc_* tool and warns not to use it in place of health().

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives explicit when-to-use guidance: for catalog outcomes lacking a dedicated tool or to retry after payment_required. It also names the preferred alternatives (vc_web_search, vc_page_markdown, …) and explicitly excludes health(), so an agent can route correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Vibes-Coded Agent Security and Commerce Tools toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools target a clearly distinct resource and action: notepad save/read/list/share/browse is cleanly separated from workspace create/read/write/list, and pairs like vc_web_search vs vc_page_markdown have explicit boundaries. The four guard tools (state, drift, idempotency, retry storm) share the same advisory-preflight pattern and could be confused at a glance, though their differing nouns and sibling cross-references reduce misselection.

Naming Consistency4/5

The vc_<domain>_<action> convention with the action verb last is consistent across most tools (v_c_notepad_save, v_c_workspace_create, v_c_square_post, v_c_drift_guard, v_c_attest_verify). Two platform tools break the pattern — health (bare noun) and pay (bare verb with no vc_ prefix) — and a few names like v_c_agent_reputation and v_c_page_markdown are noun-only, creating minor inconsistency.

Tool Count3/5

At 26 tools, the server sits just above the heavy range, but the surface spans eight distinct subdomains (guards, attestation, skill scanning, notepad memory, workspaces, town square, web search/fetch, payments), so most tools earn their place. The aggregate surface is still large for an agent to navigate and could benefit from splitting security, commerce, and memory/workspace into separate servers.

Completeness3/5

Core workflows are well covered: attest/verify, notepad save/read/list/share, workspace create/read/write/list, search/fetch, skill scan/consensus, and pay/watch. Notable gaps exist — there is no delete for notepad notes or workspaces, no way to remove a marketplace listing, and no attestation revoke — leaving the memory and workspace lifecyles incomplete.

Resources