Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 1 parameter at 100% schema description coverage, the schema already documents accepted formats exhaustively (municipality name/code, province code, community code, district, census tract, and 'Name, Province' disambiguation). The description only restates the entity types covered, adding no syntax beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.